2010
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of the full 12-hour-long transit of the exoplanet HD 80606b

Abstract: We present new observations of a transit of the 111.4-day-period exoplanet HD 80606b. Due to this long orbital period and to the orientation of the eccentric orbit (e = 0.9), HD 80606b's transits last for about 12 hours. This makes the observation of a full transit practically impossible from a given ground-based observatory. With the Spitzer Space Telescope and its IRAC camera on the postcryogenic mission, we performed a 19-h photometric observation of HD 80606 that covers the full 2010 January 13-14 transit … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
110
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
3
110
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we apply our model to the planets HAT-P-34 b (Bakos et al 2012) and HD 80606 b (Hébrard et al 2010), both belonging to single-planet systems. The main difference between these two planets is their present orbital period, only 5.45 day for HAT-P-34 b, and about 111 day for HD 80606 b (Table 1).…”
Section: Hot Jupitersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we apply our model to the planets HAT-P-34 b (Bakos et al 2012) and HD 80606 b (Hébrard et al 2010), both belonging to single-planet systems. The main difference between these two planets is their present orbital period, only 5.45 day for HAT-P-34 b, and about 111 day for HD 80606 b (Table 1).…”
Section: Hot Jupitersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the infrared (IR) observations are affected by systematic effects that may compromise the measurements because these effects induce flux variations comparable to the depth of a planetary transit. For example, the 3.6 and 4.5 μm Spitzer/IRAC channels (InSb detectors) are affected by the pixel-phase effect (Reach et al 2005;Charbonneau et al 2005;MoralesCalderón et al 2006;Knutson et al 2008) due to the telescope jitter and intra-pixel variation in the sensitivity of the detector, which may cause a flux peak-to-peak amplitude of up to ∼1% (Beaulieu et al 2008;Hébrard et al 2010) or even higher (Désert et al 2011b;Fressin et al 2011), according to the exposure time. The light curves of the 5.8 and 8.0 μm channels (Si:As detectors) follow non-linear trends with time, called the ramp effect Knutson et al 2007a), caused by the trapping of electrons by the detector impurities (see Agol et al 2010 for further details), which produce mmag level flux variations in photometry.…”
Section: Influence Of Stellar Activity On Stellar Colours and The Chamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the three-parameter non-linear limb-darkening law, because it provides the best flexibility to capture the inherent non-linearity of the limb-darkening intensity profile and helps to avoid the deficient ATLAS model values near the limb (see Sing 2010, for more details). This law has now successfully been used to model high precision transit light curves including data from HST/NICMOS ), Spitzer (Hébrard et al 2010;Désert et al 2011), and CoRot. In the fits we also allowed the baseline flux level of each visit to linearly vary in time, which is described by the two fit-parameters.…”
Section: Transit Light Curve Fitsmentioning
confidence: 99%