2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2008.05.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of second metastable state in superheated emulsion detector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The superheated droplets, when exposed to energetic radiations, nucleate independent of each other with the production of an acoustic pulse [14] and the decay of these droplets is expected to be exponential in nature. However, when a SED is periodically exposed to neutrons [15] (or gamma ray photons) with periods of radiation-off regions in between, it is observed that the decay is not quite monotonic as expected. An example of such a nucleation rate data is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The superheated droplets, when exposed to energetic radiations, nucleate independent of each other with the production of an acoustic pulse [14] and the decay of these droplets is expected to be exponential in nature. However, when a SED is periodically exposed to neutrons [15] (or gamma ray photons) with periods of radiation-off regions in between, it is observed that the decay is not quite monotonic as expected. An example of such a nucleation rate data is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Nucleation of a droplet can be detected either by detecting the pressure pulse [14,18,19] produced due to the rapid growth of the microbubble or by detecting the volume change [20] caused due to the liquid-to-vapor phase transition. The observed nucleation rate data, as reported earlier [15], cannot be explained by a simple single-state model, and a multi-state model is required. Here, for simplicity a two-state model is used to give a proper explanation to the observed nucleation rate data.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations