The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2007.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of radiation-specific damage in cells exposed to depleted uranium: hprt gene mutation frequency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A compound exhibiting only one of these responses has to be considered to be equivocal. In more recent publications, the classification as potential mutagen was based on statistical significant increase in the number of mutant colonies (Miller et al , 2007; Stearns et al , 2002; Zettner et al , 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A compound exhibiting only one of these responses has to be considered to be equivocal. In more recent publications, the classification as potential mutagen was based on statistical significant increase in the number of mutant colonies (Miller et al , 2007; Stearns et al , 2002; Zettner et al , 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When this 570 ppb value was converted to molarity via the 1092.35 g/mol molecular weight of chelated uranium, the sensitivity is 0.52 µM. To better frame this concentration, we converted the 5.7×10 −8 g mass value to activity (assuming pure U 238 ) using the 3.36×10 −7 Ci/g U 238 specific activity 38 . The value of 19 fCi is well below the detection limits of gamma cameras and is even lower than background radiation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such toxic effects have become so well accepted within animal and in vitro research that they are generally treated as proven facts rather than postulates. Perhaps the most important such work has been carried out by Alexandra C. Miller and her research group at the Armed Forces Radiological Research Institute (Miller et al., 2003; Miller et al., 2005; Miller et al., 2007). While the effect of this research has been to strongly support DU's critics, its ostensible aim is to find and develop countermeasures and procedures for greater protection of military personnel (e.g., Miller et al., 2005).…”
Section: The Public Science Of Depleted Uraniummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A highly contentious debate on low‐level radiation, given renewed vigor by a recent National Research Council (2006) report, 11 holds open the possibility that even the low level of radiation emitted by DU cannot be safely ignored. Synergistic damage by chemical and radiological means has sparked renewed interest (Miller et al., 2007) and recent work on the “bystander effect”—a poorly understood process by which radiation‐damaged cells induce similar effects in surrounding cells—has suggested that alpha radiation may be even more damaging than previously suspected (Bonner, 2003). This point has not been lost on DU critics such as Keith Baverstock (Baverstock, 2005; Baverstock, Mothersill, & Thorne, 2001).…”
Section: The Public Science Of Depleted Uraniummentioning
confidence: 99%