2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04948-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of Rabi dynamics with a short-wavelength free-electron laser

Abstract: Rabi oscillations are periodic modulations of populations in two-level systems interacting with a time-varying field1. They are ubiquitous in physics with applications in different areas such as photonics2, nano-electronics3, electron microscopy4 and quantum information5. While the theory developed by Rabi was intended for fermions in gyrating magnetic fields, Autler and Townes realized that it could also be used to describe coherent light–matter interactions within the rotating-wave approximation6. Although i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, however, the photoelectron wave packets from the two pathways do not interfere with each other since the photoelectron and ionic core constitute one composite whole quantum system, and the two ionization pathways leave different ionic states (2s –1 and 2p –1 , denoted by |2⟩ and |1⟩, respectively), or, in other words, the photoelectron and ionic subsystems are entangled as c 2α |2⟩|α⟩ + c 1β |1⟩|β⟩, with c 2α and c 1β being the amplitudes of the corresponding states. Such a correlation or entanglement between the photoelectron and ionic states is attracting increasing attention in attosecond science. Now, since ℏω is equal to the energy difference between the 2s –1 and 2p –1 states, the fundamental pulse couples the two ionic states, inducing Rabi oscillations. If the 2p –1 ionic state (|1⟩) is excited to 2s –1 (|2⟩) (i.e., if the 2s electron is excited to 2p) (Figure c) or vice versa (Figure d), the two photoelectron states |α⟩ and |β⟩ can interfere with each other. Hence, a question arises, “does the Rabi coupling convert the entanglement to coherent superposition, leading to, e.g., coherent control of the photoelectron angular distribution through the ω–2ω relative phase?”…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In this case, however, the photoelectron wave packets from the two pathways do not interfere with each other since the photoelectron and ionic core constitute one composite whole quantum system, and the two ionization pathways leave different ionic states (2s –1 and 2p –1 , denoted by |2⟩ and |1⟩, respectively), or, in other words, the photoelectron and ionic subsystems are entangled as c 2α |2⟩|α⟩ + c 1β |1⟩|β⟩, with c 2α and c 1β being the amplitudes of the corresponding states. Such a correlation or entanglement between the photoelectron and ionic states is attracting increasing attention in attosecond science. Now, since ℏω is equal to the energy difference between the 2s –1 and 2p –1 states, the fundamental pulse couples the two ionic states, inducing Rabi oscillations. If the 2p –1 ionic state (|1⟩) is excited to 2s –1 (|2⟩) (i.e., if the 2s electron is excited to 2p) (Figure c) or vice versa (Figure d), the two photoelectron states |α⟩ and |β⟩ can interfere with each other. Hence, a question arises, “does the Rabi coupling convert the entanglement to coherent superposition, leading to, e.g., coherent control of the photoelectron angular distribution through the ω–2ω relative phase?”…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Back on the quantum side, breakthroughs in optical frequency comb control now enable atomic clocks to operate at optical frequencies [71,72] (beyond 10 1 5Hz). Further on the quantum side, 2022 also saw the demonstration of a Rabi cycle (that is, a single-qubit gate) taking only 52fs, using extreme-ultraviolet pulses acting on Helium atoms [73].…”
Section: Potential Ways Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an exchange, in the strong light–matter coupling regime, results in anti‐crossing between the atom‐like emitter and the cavity‐mode dispersion relations, which is described by the so‐called Rabi splitting. [ 2–4 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an exchange, in the strong light-matter coupling regime, results in anti-crossing between the atom-like emitter and the cavity-mode dispersion relations, which is described by the so-called Rabi splitting. [2][3][4] As a physical phenomenon arising from light-matter interactions in the strong coupling regime, Rabi splitting enables quantum coherent oscillations between the joint systems and the quantum superpositions of different quantum states. In the early 1980s, Rabi splitting was observed for many atoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%