2013
DOI: 10.7567/jjap.52.073002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of Precessional Magnetization Dynamics in L10-FePt Thin Films with Different L10 Order Parameter Values

Abstract: Fast magnetization precession was observed in L10-FePt thin films with different L10 order parameter values by all optical pump–probe technique. Precession frequency was varied widely for the films with different order parameter, which is due to large difference in perpendicular magnetic anisotropy. Gilbert damping constant (α) was estimated from relaxation time as apparent damping. Clear difference in α was not observed with different perpendicular magnetic anisotropy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(27 reference statements)
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We list the damping values and compare the calculated magnetic moments and the experimental data in Table I calculated is in good quantitative agreement with experiment. 3,31 The damping value of FePt 0.02 also agrees with the measurement by Iihama and Ando et al 32 The distinctly larger damping of Pt-based to Pd-based alloys is caused by the stronger SOI strength in Pt (0.5 eV) than Pd (0.15 eV). We verified the damping computation is robust to the TB orbit parameters.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…We list the damping values and compare the calculated magnetic moments and the experimental data in Table I calculated is in good quantitative agreement with experiment. 3,31 The damping value of FePt 0.02 also agrees with the measurement by Iihama and Ando et al 32 The distinctly larger damping of Pt-based to Pd-based alloys is caused by the stronger SOI strength in Pt (0.5 eV) than Pd (0.15 eV). We verified the damping computation is robust to the TB orbit parameters.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…The difference between the experimental data and calculated data diverged with increasing θ H , and the reason for this remaining unclear at present. This behavior was also observed for the L1 0 -FePt film 7) . Furthermore, we tried to explain the dependence of 1/τ on θ H by using the two-magnon scattering model 32) since 1/τ enhancement at θ > 45 • with this model has been reported for polycrystalline Co film 30,31) .…”
Section: (B) and 3(c)supporting
confidence: 73%
“…Recently, fast magnetization dynamics for films with large PMA such as L1 0 -FePt and L1 0 -FePdPt alloys, and Co/Pt and Co/Pd multilayers have been intensively investigated [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] . The reported α values for these materials have been 0.06−0.2 [5][6][7] for L1 0 -FePt alloy, 0.05−0.15 10,11) for Co/Pt multilayers, and 0.04−0.2 12,13) for Co/Pd multilayers, which are much larger than those for Fe and Co. One reason for the large α is the presence of heavy elements Pt and Pd because α originates from their spin-orbit interactions 9,[14][15][16] . Despite many reports on other films with PMA [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] , α values for L1 0 -FePd are unclear at present.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is difficult to determine the electron-phonon scattering rate sufficiently accurate from experiments, while the electron-impurity scattering can be controlled by either doping or artificial disorder. However, no direct experiments have been reported to verify quantitatively the relationship between α 0 and 1/τ e through impurity scattering despite many attempts [33,[44][45][46][47]. The challenge lies in the fact that α 0 also depends on other leading parameters, such as magnetization M S [33], SOI [44], lattice distortion [47], and D(E F ) [40], which may vary significantly when the impurity concentration is modulated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is difficult to determine the electron-phonon scattering rate sufficiently accurate from experiments, while the electron-impurity scattering can be controlled by either doping or artificial disorder. However, no direct experiments have been reported to verify quantitatively the relationship between α 0 and 1/τ e through impurity scattering despite many attempts [33,[44][45][46][47] may vary significantly when the impurity concentration is modulated. It is difficult to quantitatively investigate the impact of 1/τ e on α 0 in those material systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%