Observation of New States Decaying into<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">c</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant=

Artuso, M.; Ayad, R.; Boulahouache, C.; Bukin, K.; Dambasuren, E.; Karamov, S.; Majumder, G.; Moneti, G. C.; Mountain, R.; Schuh, S.; Skwarnicki, T.; Stone, S.; Wang, J. C.; Wolf, A.; Wu, J.; Köpp, S.; Kostin, M.; Mahmood, A. H.; Csorna, S. E.; Dankó, I.; McLean, K. W.; Xu, Z.; Godang, R.; Bonvicini, G.; Cinabro, D.; Dubrovin, M.; McGee, Steven; Zhou, G. J.; Lipeles, E.; Pappas, S. P.; Śchmidtler, M.; Shapiro, A.; Sun, W.; Weinstein, A. J.; Würthwein, F.; Jaffe, D. E.; Masek, G.; Paar, H. P.; Potter, E. M.; Prell, S.; Asner, D. M.; Eppich, A.; Hill, T. S.; Morrison, R. J.; Briere, R. A.; Chen, G. P.; Gritsan, A. V.; Alexander, J. P.; Baker, R. C.; Bebek, C.; Berger, B. E.; Berkelman, K.; Blanc, F.; Boisvert, V.; Cassel, D. G.; Drell, P. S.; Duboscq, J. E.; Ecklund, K. M.; Ehrlich, R.; Foland, A.; Gaidarev, P.; Galik, R. S.; Gibbons, L.; Gittelman, B.; Gray, S. W.; Hartill, D. L.; Heltsley, B. K.; Hopman, P. I.; Hsu, L.; Jones, C. D.; Kandaswamy, J.; Kreinick, D. L.; Lohner, M.; Magerkurth, A.; Meyer, T. O.; Mistry, N. B.; Nordberg, E.; Palmer, M.; Patterson, J. R.; Peterson, D.; Riley, D.; Romano, A.; Thayer, J. G.; Urner, D.; Valant-Spaight, B.; Viehhauser, G. H. A.; Warburton, A.; Avery, P.; Prescott, C.; Rubiera, A. I.; Stoeck, H.; Yelton, J.; Brandenburg, G.; Ershov, A.; Kim, D. Y J; Wilson, Richard; Bergfeld, T.; Eisenstein, B. I.; Ernst, J.; Gladding, G. E.; Gollin, G. D.; Hans, R. M.; Johnson, E.; Karliner, I.; Marsh, M. A.; Plager, C.; Sedlack, C.; Selen, M.; Thaler, J. J.; Williams, James S.; Edwards, K. W.; Janicek, R.; Patel, P. M.; Sadoff, A. J.; Ammar, R.; Bean, A.; Besson, D.; Zhao, X.; Anderson, S.; Frolov, V. V.; Kubota, Y.; Lee, S. J.; Mahapatra, R.; O’Neill, J. J.; Poling, R.; Riehle, T.; Smith, A.; Stepaniak, C. J.; Urheim, J.; Ahmed, S.; Alam, M. S.; Athar, S. B.; Jian, L.; Liu, Ling; Saleem, M.; Timm, S.; Wappler, F. R.; Anastassov, A.; Eckhart, E. A.; Gan, K. K.; Gwon, C.; Hart, T.; Honscheid, K.; Hufnagel, D.; Kagan, H.; Kass, R.; Pedlar, T. K.; Schwarthoff, H.; Thayer, J. B.; Toerne, E. von; Zoeller, M. M.; Richichi, S. J.; Severini, H.; Skubic, P.; Undrus, A.; Chen, S.; Fast, J. E.; Hinson, J. W.; Lee, J.; Miller, D. H.; Shibata, E. I.; Shipsey, I. P. J.; Pavlunin, V.; Cronin-Hennessy, D.; Lyon, A. L.; Thorndike, E. H.; Savinov, V.; Coan, T. E.; Fadeyev, V.; Gao, Y. S.; Maravin, Y.; Narsky, I.; Stroynowski, R.; Ye, J.; Włodek, T.

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.4479

Cited by 115 publications

(64 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Recently, the ratio of branching fractions (30) has been estimated by the Belle Collaboration [4]. Combining this with the predicted partial widths of c (2815) and c (2645) in Tables 8 and 9, the branching fraction B( c (2980) + → c (2580) 0 π + ) is evaluated to be about 40%, which is consistent with our direct result of 41.8%.…”

Section: Experimentally Well-established 1s and 1p Statessupporting

confidence: 87%

“…Although many experimental and theoretical efforts have [30], and confirmed by Belle in the c (2455)π mode [31,32]. Because both + c and + c excitations can decay through + c π + π − and c (2455)π , we even do not know whether the observed charmed baryon signal around 2765 MeV is the + c or + c state, or their overlapping structure [33].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Low-lying charmed and charmed-strange baryon states

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this work, we systematically study the mass spectra and strong decays of 1P and 2S charmed and charmed-strange baryons in the framework of non-relativistic constituent quark models. With the light quark cluster-heavy quark picture, the masses are simply calculated by a potential model. The strong decays are studied by the EichtenHill-Quigg decay formula. Masses and decay properties of the well-established 1S and 1P states can be reproduced by our method.

show abstract

Section: Experimentally Well-established 1s and 1p Statessupporting

confidence: 87%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Low-lying charmed and charmed-strange baryon states

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A broad structure has been seen previously in the Λ + c π + π − final state that is referred to as the Λ c (2765) + [58]. It could contribute to the D 0 p amplitude if its width is large.…”

Section: Fit In the Near-threshold Regionmentioning

confidence: 75%

Study of the D 0 p amplitude in Λ b 0 → D 0 pπ − decays

Aaij¹,

Adeva²,

Adinolfi³

et al. 2017

J. High Energ. Phys.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…[9,10,14,71,72]. The chiral Lagrangian involves two coupling constants, g 1 and g 2 , for P -wave transitions between s-wave and s-wave baryons [68]; six couplings, h 2 − h 7 , for the S-wave transitions between s-wave and p-wave baryons; and eight couplings; h 8 − h 15 , for the D-wave transitions between s-wave and p-wave baryons [9]. The general chiral Lagrangian for heavy baryons coupled to pseudoscalar mesons can be expressed compactly in terms of superfields.…”

Section: Strong Decaysmentioning

confidence: 99%