1987
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4608/17/8/003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of intermultiplet transitions in rare-earth metal ions by inelastic neutron scattering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A vertical line at ( = 146 meV indicates the spin-orbit strength listed by Carnall et al [5]. We note, however, that the neutron measurements of Williams et al and Needham et al [1,3] put the first excited level 6 H 7 ; 2 at 130 meV above the ground state, which corresponds to a spin-orbit strength ( ~ 160 me V in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Energy Levels Of Samarium (Sm 3 +)mentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A vertical line at ( = 146 meV indicates the spin-orbit strength listed by Carnall et al [5]. We note, however, that the neutron measurements of Williams et al and Needham et al [1,3] put the first excited level 6 H 7 ; 2 at 130 meV above the ground state, which corresponds to a spin-orbit strength ( ~ 160 me V in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Energy Levels Of Samarium (Sm 3 +)mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Kl41t rA• 1 J Figure 4: A calculated neutron spectrum resulting from neutrons with a sample incident energy of 2500 meV. The peak at 130 meV has been observed by Williams et al [1]. The additional spectral features around 800 meV arise from inter-term (Coulomb) transitions induced by magnetic neutron scattering.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have established an exchange and crystal-field model t o account for available experimental data on the R (FellTi) series. The first excited multiplet 6~~1 2 of the sm3+ ion is only 1438 K [7] above the ground state 6~s12. It is therefore necessary to take account of J-mixing as in the case of SmM5 (M = Co [8,91,Ni [lo]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is therefore necessary to take account of J-mixing as in the case of SmM5 (M = Co [8,91,Ni [lo]). The total Hamiltonian for the sm3+ ion can be written as The first term above is due to spin-orbit coupling with X = 411.1 K [7]; the second term represents the exchange interaction between Sm and Fe sublattices, with an exchange coefficient ns,F, deduced from the Curie temperature [ll] of 300 po; the third term is the crystal-field Hamiltonian for the 2a site in the tetrago- field. Our method of calculation is the same as that used for NdzFelrB [14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%