1987
DOI: 10.1016/0030-4018(87)90225-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of depolarization and backscattering enhancement in light scattering from gaussian random surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This we believe is the main reason for the reduced amplitude of the mean differential reflection coefficients in these cases relative to those of Fig. 2 [16,17,18,19]. However, the structures seen as peaks in the backscattering directions of the cross-polarized scattering, Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This we believe is the main reason for the reduced amplitude of the mean differential reflection coefficients in these cases relative to those of Fig. 2 [16,17,18,19]. However, the structures seen as peaks in the backscattering directions of the cross-polarized scattering, Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…However, for non-normal incidence, the patterns do show less symmetry, as expected, and an even richer and more complicated angular structure. In principle, the enhanced backscattering peak phenomenon should exist in both coand cross-polarized scattering [17,18,19]. However, for the roughness parameters assumed in this work, one observes instead of a well-pronounced peak in the backscattering direction, a ridge of constant enhanced intensity in parts of the backscattering plane (q In passing, we note that having available only the inplane and out-of-plane results for the same angle of incidence, the local enhancements observed in e.g.…”
Section: Fig 2: (Color Online)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous analysis of optical disk memories and other random or rough surfaces has typically described the incident field as a plane wave. [1][2][3][4][5][6] As the numerical aperture of the incident light increases, as is the case for the new digital video disk (DVD) format, this approximation becomes less satisfactory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ÂÓâAEÖ Ô ÍÑÅÇÓÇÐÕÐÞÏË à××ÇÍÕÂÏË Ä ÏÐÑÅÑÍÓÂÕÐÑÏ ÓÂÔÔÇâÐËË Ä ÑÃÝÇÏÐÞØ ÔËÔÕÇÏÂØ ÐÇAEÂÄÐÑ ÃÞÎÑ ÑÃÐÂÓÖ-ÉÇÐÑ [36,37] Ë ËÐÕÇÐÔËÄÐÑ ËÔÔÎÇAEÖÇÕÔâ âÄÎÇÐËÇ ÄÑÊÓÂÔÕÂ-ÐËâ ÑÃÓÂÕÐÑÅÑ ÓÂÔÔÇâÐËâ РÔËÎßÐÑ ÛÇÓÑØÑÄÂÕÞØ ÒÑÄÇÓØ-ÐÑÔÕâØ. ¥Îâ ËÔÍÎáÚÇÐËâ ÑÃÝÇÏÐÑÅÑ ÓÂÔÔÇâÐËâ ÒÓÂÍÕËÚÇ-ÔÍË ÄÔÇ ËÊÏÇÓÇÐËâ ÒÓÑÄÑAEâÕÔâ РÏÇÕÂÎÎËÚÇÔÍËØ ÒÑÄÇÓØÐÑÔÕâØ.…”
unclassified