1994
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.49.3443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of current-discontinuity lines in type-II superconductors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It could be experimentally observed that the magnetic flux distribution around a circular defect in a superconducting thin film cannot be described by a model which was often used in the case of thin films, [11][12][13][14] though it was originally reduced by Campbell and Evetts for a cylindrical defect in an infinitely long sample. 10 We explain our observation by screening currents in the Meissner region ( jϽ j c ) which are present in thin superconducting films exposed to a perpendicular magnetic field in contrast to infinitely long samples exposed to a parallel field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It could be experimentally observed that the magnetic flux distribution around a circular defect in a superconducting thin film cannot be described by a model which was often used in the case of thin films, [11][12][13][14] though it was originally reduced by Campbell and Evetts for a cylindrical defect in an infinitely long sample. 10 We explain our observation by screening currents in the Meissner region ( jϽ j c ) which are present in thin superconducting films exposed to a perpendicular magnetic field in contrast to infinitely long samples exposed to a parallel field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameter p of the parabolic discontinuity line with the equation yϭx 2 /2p corresponds to the defect diameter 2R. Since Schuster and co-workers, 11,12 this model has also been used to describe the influence of circular defects in superconducting thin films. 13,14 In contrast to the sample geometry considered by Campbell and Evetts, the demagnetizing factor of a thin film cannot be neglected, and screening currents flow not only in the outer parts of the sample which are already in the critical state ( jϭ j c ), but also in the central parts even if they are still in the Meissner state ( jϽ j c ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evidently, the excess penetration is not equal to the indentation radius, r 0 , as in the case of the bulk Bean model. 2,3,19 Moreover, ∆ turns out to be fielddependent. Initially, ∆ increases, then reaches a maximum followed by a decrease at larger H a .…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that case, however, it may cost us the reduction of the critical current. So, there is a method of patterning filaments on the HTSC coated conductors to reduce the hysteresis loss while keeping almost the area of conductors [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. It is required to analyze the sample which is patterned filamentary but most of the measurement method gives information only about the whole sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%