2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2005.07.080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of aqueous Cm(III)/Eu(III) and UO22+ nanoparticulates at concentrations approaching solubility limit by laser-induced fluorescence spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(33 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both compounds showed strong luminescence with emission spectral maxima located at 616.6 nm for Eu 2:1 and 690.5 nm for Am 2:1 (Figure A,B). These spectral positions are similar to those observed in other Eu­(III) and Am­(III) complexes. , The profiles of the emission spectra recorded at different delay times (data not shown) remained the same for both Eu 2:1 and Am 2:1 , suggesting a single Eu­(III)/Am­(III) coordination environment in these compounds. Consistent with these observations, the luminescence decays of both Eu 2:1 and Am 2:1 showed single exponential decays (Figure S5A,B in the Supporting Information) with luminescence lifetimes of 749 ± 70 μs for Eu 2:1 and 228 ± 6 ns for Am 2:1 , calculated for data from triplicate measurements.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both compounds showed strong luminescence with emission spectral maxima located at 616.6 nm for Eu 2:1 and 690.5 nm for Am 2:1 (Figure A,B). These spectral positions are similar to those observed in other Eu­(III) and Am­(III) complexes. , The profiles of the emission spectra recorded at different delay times (data not shown) remained the same for both Eu 2:1 and Am 2:1 , suggesting a single Eu­(III)/Am­(III) coordination environment in these compounds. Consistent with these observations, the luminescence decays of both Eu 2:1 and Am 2:1 showed single exponential decays (Figure S5A,B in the Supporting Information) with luminescence lifetimes of 749 ± 70 μs for Eu 2:1 and 228 ± 6 ns for Am 2:1 , calculated for data from triplicate measurements.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…These spectral positions are similar to those observed in other Eu(III) and Am(III) complexes. 51,52 The profiles of the emission spectra recorded at different delay times (data not shown) remained the same for both Eu 2:1 and Am 2:1, suggesting a single Eu(III)/Am(III) coordination environment in these compounds. Consistent with these observations, the luminescence decays of both Eu 2:1 and Am 2:1 showed single exponential decays (Figure S5A,B in the Supporting a N L refers to the nitrogen atom in ligand L. Ionic radii 48 are listed with respect to the coordination numbers indicated as Roman numerals.…”
Section: Inorganic Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Testimony of these efforts are the publications previously mentioned of the NEA-TDB reviews, as well as the many specific experimental works, which have been mainly conducted at room temperature. Nevertheless, not so many of these experiments were performed at temperatures above 20-25 °C, although higher temperatures can help stabilizing solid phases, which is a prerequisite when performing solubility measurements (Giffaut, 1994 (Altmaier et al, 2004;Wang et al, 2006) in the metastability domain around the solubility limits (see Figure 7.2 in Stumm and Morgan, 1996). This requires the use of adequate techniques for particle detection (Walther, 2003), 10/41 and often complicates the validation of solubility data interpretation models with equilibrium reactions.…”
Section: The Carbonate Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their study, particle adsorption at etched calcite surfaces with surface steps and pits in the nanometer scale showed mineral surface heterogeneity over large areas (up to >200 000 μm 2 ) and the importance of surface roughness on colloid retention. 31 Moreover, several studies reported the individual sorption behavior of radionuclides, for example, Cm(III), 45,46 Eu-(III), 44,46 Am(III), 3,45,47 Th(IV), 44,47 Np(V), 47 Pu(IV), 47,48 U(VI) 44,47 and colloids as well as colloid retention in the presence of radionuclides at mineral surfaces. These studies focused on the impact of pH, 24 zeta potentials of colloids and interfaces, 49 system ionic strength, 50−52 and colloidal size.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%