2018
DOI: 10.1039/c7nr07951f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of a low temperature n–p transition in individual titania nanotubes

Abstract: Manipulating the transport properties of titania nanotubes (NTs) is paramount in guaranteeing the material's successful implementation in various solid state applications. Here we present the unique semiconducting properties of individual titania NTs as revealed from thermoelectric and structural studies performed on the same individual NTs. The NTs were in the anatase phase fabricated by anodic oxidation and doped with intrinsic defects created by reducing the lattice thermally. Despite their polycrystalline … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The electronic band structures of g-C 3 N 4 , NH 2 –UiO-66/g-C 3 N 4 , and CD@NH 2 –UiO-66/g-C 3 N 4 were further investigated by examining Mott–Schottky plots. As shown in Figure c, CD@NH 2 –UiO-66/g-C 3 N 4 , NH 2 –UiO-66/g-C 3 N 4 , NH 2 –UiO-66, and g-C 3 N 4 exhibited positive slopes in the Mott–Schottky plots at frequencies of 500 Hz, which was an indication of the n-type semiconductors . The results of Mott–Schottky measurements indicate that the flat band position of NH 2 –UiO-66, g-C 3 N 4 , NH 2 –UiO-66/g-C 3 N 4 , and CD@NH 2 –UiO-66/g-C 3 N 4 are about −0.79, −1.15, −0.72, and −0.68 V, respectively, with reference to the saturated calomel electrode (SCE).…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The electronic band structures of g-C 3 N 4 , NH 2 –UiO-66/g-C 3 N 4 , and CD@NH 2 –UiO-66/g-C 3 N 4 were further investigated by examining Mott–Schottky plots. As shown in Figure c, CD@NH 2 –UiO-66/g-C 3 N 4 , NH 2 –UiO-66/g-C 3 N 4 , NH 2 –UiO-66, and g-C 3 N 4 exhibited positive slopes in the Mott–Schottky plots at frequencies of 500 Hz, which was an indication of the n-type semiconductors . The results of Mott–Schottky measurements indicate that the flat band position of NH 2 –UiO-66, g-C 3 N 4 , NH 2 –UiO-66/g-C 3 N 4 , and CD@NH 2 –UiO-66/g-C 3 N 4 are about −0.79, −1.15, −0.72, and −0.68 V, respectively, with reference to the saturated calomel electrode (SCE).…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 2c, CD@NH 2 −UiO-66/g-C 3 N 4 , NH 2 −UiO-66/g-C 3 N 4 , NH 2 −UiO-66, and g-C 3 N 4 exhibited positive slopes in the Mott−Schottky plots at frequencies of 500 Hz, which was an indication of the n-type semiconductors. 49 The results of Mott−Schottky measurements indicate that the flat band position of NH 2 −UiO-66, g-C 3 N 4 , NH 2 −UiO-66/g-C 3 N 4 , and CD@NH 2 −UiO-66/g-C 3 N 4 are about −0.79, −1.15, −0.72, and −0.68 V, respectively, with reference to the saturated calomel electrode (SCE). It is widely recognized that the bottom of the conduction band in many n-type semiconductors is more negative by 0.15 V than the flat band potential.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bipolar transport indicates that both electrons and holes contribute to electrical and thermoelectrical properties at the same time. [35,36] The measured Seebeck coefficient is a combination of the negative Seebeck coefficient from the electrons and the positive Seebeck coefficient from the holes. [37,38] The sign change of the total Seebeck coefficient is determined by the proportion of the electron Seebeck coefficient and the hole Seebeck coefficient.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31,32 The reduced thermal conductivity of AlN thin films, is due to increased phonon scattering rate at the grain boundaries among others, impurity scattering, and micro-structural defects. To quantify the true contribution of the various phonon scattering parameters we used the Callaway/Klemens' formulation 5,33 derived from Boltzmann transport equation used previously 34,35 which was modified and discussed in detail below.…”
Section: Thermal Conductivity and Callaway Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%