1987
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(87)90871-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of a high-energy cosmic-ray family caused by a Centauro-type nuclear interaction in the joint emulsion chamber experiment at the Pamirs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(7 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One may argue that the smaller family energy in the experimental data is due to a systematic underestimation of the shower energy in the emulsion chamber. The integral spectrum of family energy observed by the present hybrid experiment is smoothly connected to that of the emulsion-chamber experiment conducted by the Brazil-Japan collaboration [1,3]. We can therefore conclude that the energy estimation of high-energy particles in the emulsion chamber of the present hybrid experiment is not much different from that of the emulsion-chamber experiment of the BrazilJapan collaboration.…”
Section: The Hybrid Experiments At Mt Chacaltayasupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One may argue that the smaller family energy in the experimental data is due to a systematic underestimation of the shower energy in the emulsion chamber. The integral spectrum of family energy observed by the present hybrid experiment is smoothly connected to that of the emulsion-chamber experiment conducted by the Brazil-Japan collaboration [1,3]. We can therefore conclude that the energy estimation of high-energy particles in the emulsion chamber of the present hybrid experiment is not much different from that of the emulsion-chamber experiment of the BrazilJapan collaboration.…”
Section: The Hybrid Experiments At Mt Chacaltayasupporting
confidence: 68%
“…These measurements show that the charged-particle density in the central rapidity region follows a simple power law (see the old Fermi and Landau hydrodynamic model [86][87][88] used some time ago in cosmic rays) at laboratory energies from as low as 10 GeV up to 2.6 ×10 7 GeV (see also ALICE first results at 7 TeV [89]). Specifically the power law exponent, close to α = 0.13, found at energies 10 − 1 5 × 10 3 GeV [90] and α = 0.11, is the same as that found for laboratory energies 1.5 ×10 3 − 1.5 ×10 5 GeV [91]. Secondly, the knowledge of scaling violation in the nuclear interactions, which determines the factor ( / 0 ) α [90] where 0 is the energy of the breaking of scaling occurs efficiently, is crucial for understanding cosmic ray cascades.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, some anomalous CR interaction events have been observed in XREC experiment at Chacaltaya mountain which have an abnormal multiplicity ratio of their charged and neutral hadronic products [43]; later on, similar events (named Centauros and Anti-Centauros) were discovered by the Pamir experiment [44] and at balloons [45]. The isospin symmetry which is commonly kept in strong interaction of usual hadrons is roughly violated in the events of such type, so that there has been made a hypothesis that in the primary CR flow there is some abnormal component constituted by the particles of the strange quark matter [46].…”
Section: The Cosmic Ray Study At the Tien Shan Mountain Stationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter was made using an UA5 model of particles interaction (model A) which was based on extrapolation of contemporary accelerator data, and for the two suppositions concerning the chemical composition of primary cosmic rays: a "light" content, with ∼60% share of protons and alpha-particles, and a heavy one, with a ∼(40 − 50)% predominance of Fe nuclei. Another model (B) anticipated forced production of the exotic "Centauro species" events [43,44,45], with the relative share of energy transfer into secondary gamma ray quanta reduced to an order of magnitude. It follows from Fig.…”
Section: The Energy Range Of Scaling Violationmentioning
confidence: 99%