The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2011 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/vast.2011.6102449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation-level interaction with statistical models for visual analytics

Abstract: In visual analytics, sensemaking is facilitated through interactive visual exploration of data. Throughout this dynamic process, users combine their domain knowledge with the dataset to create insight. Therefore, visual analytic tools exist that aid sensemaking by providing various interaction techniques that focus on allowing users to change the visual representation through adjusting parameters of the underlying statistical model. However, we postulate that the process of sensemaking is not focused on a seri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
83
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This concept is very much alike what Endert et al [21,22] describe as "Observation-level spatialization", that enables users to interact directly with projected data points, instead of manipulating parameters separately. In their work, however, the focus is to provide more insight into a given data set by permitting the user to rearrange the projected points based on a priori knowledge of the data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This concept is very much alike what Endert et al [21,22] describe as "Observation-level spatialization", that enables users to interact directly with projected data points, instead of manipulating parameters separately. In their work, however, the focus is to provide more insight into a given data set by permitting the user to rearrange the projected points based on a priori knowledge of the data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In Chapter 4, RQ2 is addressed through discussing the design principles of semantic interaction and the design of the prototype, ForceSPIRE. This chapter is informed by previously published research (i.e., [25,26,28,50]). An evaluation of semantic interaction in ForceSPIRE is presented in Chapter 5, addressing RQ3.…”
Section: Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56] Groups & Classification [57] [58], [59] [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68], [69], [70], [71], [72], [73], [74] [75], [76], [77], [78], [79], [80] Dependence & Prediction [81], [82], [46] [83], [84], [85], [86], [87], [88], [89] [90], [91], [92] being analyzed. The results are then presented to the user through different visual encodings that are often accompanied by interaction.…”
Section: Levels Of Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ingram et al [54] present a system called DimStiller, where a selection of data transformations are chained together interactively to achieve dimension reduction (see Figure 2). Endert et al [53] introduce observation level interactions to assist computational analysis tools to deliver more reliable results. The authors describe such operations as enabling the direct manipulation for visual analytics [55].…”
Section: Tight Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%