2020
DOI: 10.1785/0220190362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation by Means of An Underground Ring Laser Gyroscope of Love Waves Generated in the Mediterranean Sea: Source Direction and Comparison with Models

Abstract: In fall 2018, we have observed, by means of an underground ring laser gyroscope, the microseismic (MS) activity induced by the Mediterranean Sea in the 2–5 s period range. In the amplitude spectra, a clear peak highly correlated with a collocated seismometer appears during a large storm activity ranging from 24 November to 1 December 2018. The peak of the spectra, both for rotation rate and acceleration, are located at 3.3 s. The peak amplitudes are of 8×10−10  rad/s−1 and 3×10−6  ms−2, respectively, for verti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We report as an example the result of two events in Figure 2 . In both the sub-figures of Figure 2 , we can note a high correlation portion before the p onset that is due to the Love waves present in the secondary microseism generated by the Mediterranean Sea that is better described in [ 10 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We report as an example the result of two events in Figure 2 . In both the sub-figures of Figure 2 , we can note a high correlation portion before the p onset that is due to the Love waves present in the secondary microseism generated by the Mediterranean Sea that is better described in [ 10 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We report as an example the result of two events in Figure 2. In both the sub-figures of Figure 2, we can note a high correlation portion before the p onset that is due to the Love waves present in the secondary microseism generated by the Mediterranean Sea that is better described in [10]. The resolution of BAZ with a single seismometer relies on analyzing the projections of the P onset over the radial and vertical axes which is not always clear, leaving us then with an ambiguity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our polarization analyses show that a cyclone located in the Mozambique Channel (e.g., Idai, March 2019, Figure S5c) does not influence the recorded SM in La Réunion, which is fully consistent with the PSD results in Section 3.1.3 that showed weak amplitudes. Tracking the cyclone trajectory is beyond the scope of the present work, but should be achieved using different methods e.g., [9,[18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Secondary Microseisms Source Locationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gualtieri et al [17] analyzed 22 years of seismic data to estimate the relationship between the TC in the Pacific Ocean and the SM recorded by seismic stations located in the northwest of Pacific. Several studies involving the use of the microseismic data have shown the feasibility of tracking the TC using the microseismic noise e.g., [9,16,[18][19][20][21]. Apart from the works of Davy et al [4,9] and Barruol et al [13], none of these studies focused on the cyclone activity in the SWIO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%