2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10236-012-0554-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation and simulation of a floe drift near the North Pole

Abstract: The drift trajectory of a floe near the North Pole (87°N, 175°W) was observed during 8-19 August, 2010 based on the fourth Chinese National Arctic Research Expedition. The trajectory of the floe showed circular motions superimposed on straight drift. Each cycle had a period of about 12 h. The circular motion is inertial oscillation. The largest amplitude of inertial oscillation speed can reach 20 cm/ s. After removing the inertial oscillation, the floe drift direction is about 40°on average to the right of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Um represents the mean state, and this can be estimated from the constant ratio We first calculated Um by averaging the ratio (U/Ua) over 6 hour for the months of November and December 2012, obtaining Um = 0.018 m s -1 ± 0.007 (N=244). This value is comparable to or slightly larger than the values reported in some of previous studies (Shu et al, 2012;Fissel and Tang, 1991;Thorndike and Colony, 1982), although other studies have shown smaller values (Lukovich et al, 2011). U was then calculated by U = U -Um.…”
Section: Atmospheric Forcingsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Um represents the mean state, and this can be estimated from the constant ratio We first calculated Um by averaging the ratio (U/Ua) over 6 hour for the months of November and December 2012, obtaining Um = 0.018 m s -1 ± 0.007 (N=244). This value is comparable to or slightly larger than the values reported in some of previous studies (Shu et al, 2012;Fissel and Tang, 1991;Thorndike and Colony, 1982), although other studies have shown smaller values (Lukovich et al, 2011). U was then calculated by U = U -Um.…”
Section: Atmospheric Forcingsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…high-resolution sea ice dynamic models to reproduce linear kinematic features of ice deformation (e.g., Hutter and Losch, 2020). Dependence of the ratio of ice speed to wind speed on resampling frequency implies that temporal resolution should be considered carefully when using wind forcing data to parameterize or simulate sea ice drift (e.g., Shu et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figures 3a-3d show that C dw varies with Re at different D/h w and α w (Note that open circles represent FDS results, see details in Section 4.2). According to the ridge parameters and ice velocity characteristics in Table 1 (Kreyscher et al, 2000;Leppäranta, 2011;Shu et al, 2012;Thorndike & Colony, 1982), Re ranges from 8.7 × 10 4 to 1.1 × 10 8 in the Arctic Ocean. Field experiments have been performed to study the turbulent boundary layer under sea ice (McPhee, 2002(McPhee, , 2008.…”
Section: Labe Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note. The Reynolds number Re is calculated from keel wet length (Equation 6), where ice velocity U takes on a characteristic value between 0.01 and 1 m/s (Kreyscher et al, 2000;Leppäranta, 2011;Shu et al, 2012;Thorndike & Colony, 1982). Abbreviation: FY, first-year.…”
Section: Fds Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%