2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4872223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation and modeling of mixing-layer development in high-energy-density, blast-wave-driven shear flow

Abstract: In this work, we examine the hydrodynamics of high-energy-density (HED) shear flows. Experiments, consisting of two materials of differing density, use the OMEGA-60 laser to drive a blast wave at a pressure of ∼50 Mbar into one of the media, creating a shear flow in the resulting shocked system. The interface between the two materials is Kelvin-Helmholtz unstable, and a mixing layer of growing width develops due to the shear. To theoretically analyze the instability's behavior, we rely on two sources of inform… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mesh generation and post-processing visualization were carried out with Gmsh, a three-dimensional finite element mesh generator with built-in pre-and post-processing facilities [15]. Our code has been used previously to simulate HEDP experiments of blast-wave-driven shear flow [13].…”
Section: Physical Model and Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mesh generation and post-processing visualization were carried out with Gmsh, a three-dimensional finite element mesh generator with built-in pre-and post-processing facilities [15]. Our code has been used previously to simulate HEDP experiments of blast-wave-driven shear flow [13].…”
Section: Physical Model and Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These systems often involve a material interface with seeded interface structure, and it is often assumed or approximated that the prefabricated initial conditions and the conditions encountered by the shock are identical. This is not necessarily valid [36] and a more thorough understanding of how initial conditions evolve is important in correctly interpreting the results of these experiments. For instance, the work presented here is part of a larger experimental effort investigating shear instability in a geometry involving counterpropagating flows [37,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work producing supersonic merged flows over wedges [7] or counter-streaming supersonic flows with no seed modulation [8] generated uncontrolled, multimode initial conditions that precluded single-mode observations. Other recent work observed the growth of (random) multimode KH driven by subsonic, shear flow [9,10]. The single-mode experiment of Harding et al [11] produced rollups via a different mechanism: the baroclinic (∇ρ × ∇p) deposition of vorticity by laser-driven shock fronts, with negligible contributions from the later, subsonic shear flow.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We processed the radiographic data using an unsharpmask algorithm [10,21] to obtain the interface location, and analyzed the results to infer several quantities of interest, shown in Table I. We determined the shock location for each radiograph by locating the position where the surface of the plastic was deflected downward, and inferred the shock velocity from these observations at various times.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%