Observable Social Cognition – A Rating Scale: an interview-based assessment for schizophrenia

Abstract

Introduction Individuals with schizophrenia consistently show impairments in social cognition (SC). SC has become a potential treatment target due to its association with functional outcomes. An alternative method of assessment is to administer an observer-based scale incorporating an informant’s “first hand” impressions in ratings. Methods The present study used the Observable Social Cognition: A Rating Scale (OSCARS) in 62 outpatients and 50 non-psychiatric controls (NPCs) to assess performance in domains of SC (e.g. emotion perception, theory of mind). Results The OSCARS demonstrated sufficient internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Construct validity was assessed through an exploratory factor analysis. Patient OSCARS indices were not significantly correlated with measures of SC with the exception of aggressive attributional style. Individuals with less impairment in SC reacted more aggressively to ambiguous situations. NPC OSCARS were significantly correlated with measures of theory of mind and attributional style. In a combined sample of patients and controls, six of eight items were significantly correlated with the SC task assessing the same domain, providing modest evidence of convergent validity. In patients, the OSCARS was significantly correlated with measures of functional outcome and neurocognition. Lastly, the OSCARS was found to be significantly associated with functional outcome after the influence of objective measures of SC was statistically removed. Conclusions The present study provides preliminary evidence that the OSCARS may be useful for clinicians in collecting data about patients’ potential real-world SC deficits, in turn increasing the degree to which these impairments may be targeted in treatment.

Social cognition in schizophrenia: factor structure, clinical and functional correlates

“…Coders were required to reach acceptable levels of inter-rater reliability (ICCs and Kappas > .70) on all interview-based measures, as well as the social skill role-play. Psychometric characteristics of all measures here as well as their means and standard deviations in this sample have been reported elsewhere (Healey et al, 2015). …”

Revisiting the validity of measures of social cognitive bias in schizophrenia: Additional results from the Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation (SCOPE) study

“…The Observable Social Cognition: A Rating Scale (OSCARS; Healey, Gibson, & Penn, ) is a rating scale of the participant's performance in a number of arenas related to social cognition, including, for example, correctly understanding others’ thoughts and intentions or jumping to conclusions. There are eight items with accompanying Likert scale responses (1 = no evidence of difficulty to 7 = evidence of extreme difficulty).…”

Cognition, social cognition, and Self-assessment in schizophrenia: prediction of different elements of everyday functional outcomes

“…Importantly, the OSCARS uniquely predicted real-world outcomes beyond objective social cognitive measures with a magnitude of nearly double the variance contributed by objective-based measures of social cognition. 27 On-going research for the fifth phase of the SCOPE trial suggested that informant based ratings on the OSCARs might be a stronger predictor of functional outcomes than performance on social cognitive performance-based assessments. In particular, OSCARs ratings generated by informants who were unaware of any elements of test performance or self-reports accounted for a larger proportion of the variation in social outcomes (all r = .53-.63, all R 2 = .25-36, p < .001) than non-social outcomes (r = .38, R 2 = .14, p < .001).…”