2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obliquity of tibial component after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also recommended the 3° varus cut, however, because in some reports, an excessive varus cut was shown to decrease the implant survival in UKA. 4) Another computer simulation study recommended a slight varus implantation to reduce the peak stress on the medial cortex in the mobile-bearing OUKA. 7) Sekiguchi et al 8) reported a computer simulation study where a 2° varus cut showed the best kinematics and ligament tension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They also recommended the 3° varus cut, however, because in some reports, an excessive varus cut was shown to decrease the implant survival in UKA. 4) Another computer simulation study recommended a slight varus implantation to reduce the peak stress on the medial cortex in the mobile-bearing OUKA. 7) Sekiguchi et al 8) reported a computer simulation study where a 2° varus cut showed the best kinematics and ligament tension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) A slight varus cut has been recommended to prevent fractures because it can distance the keel from the cortex. Regarding fixed-bearing UKA, a slight varus implantation has been a popular technique to reduce mechanical stress 4) and cutting instru-ments, and computer navigation and robotic surgery can be used to adjust the varus cut angle. In OUKA, however, only orthogonal cuts against the tibial axis are available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, other authors from Japan suggested the need for a tibial component with 4 or 5 degrees varus instead of our recommendation of 2 or 3 degrees varus to maintain the joint line parallelism. 34 Further prospective studies are needed to elucidate the tibial component's more precise optimal range. Regarding KOOS subscale of symptom, the present study suggested that postoperative knee flexion angles affected the clinical scores after Oxford UKA at both postoperative years 1 and 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Varus >4 or valgus alignment caused excessive Medial/lateral (ML) translation, which could be related to feelings of instability and could potentially have negative effects on clinical outcomes and implant durability 6 . Recently, Asada et al 5 indicated that the tibial component should be installed 4 to 2 varus to the tibial mechanical axis to maintain joint-line parallelism for UKA in medial osteoarthritis patients. Barbadoro et al used the maximal total point motion (MTPM) as a predictor for implant loosening, and reported that there is correlation between varus orientation of the tibial component and MTPM from radiostereometry in UKA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%