2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(03)00142-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oblique stimuli are seen best (not worst!) in naturalistic broad-band stimuli: a horizontal effect

Abstract: People with normal eyesight typically see horizontal and vertical gratings better than oblique gratings (Psychological Bulletin 78 (1972) 266; Perception 9 (1980) 37). In the present study we investigated whether this oblique effect anisotropy is still observed when viewing more complex visual stimuli that better correspond to the content encountered in everyday viewing of the world. We show that the ability to see oriented structure in an image consisting of broadband spatial content is indeed anisotropic, bu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
103
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
8
103
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Broadband stimuli are more naturalistic, and, under such conditions, humans showed least sensitivity toward horizontal orientations (horizontal effect) (Essock et al, 2003). The normalization may then serve to increase salience of statistically less prevalent content (vertical orientations) under natural viewing conditions (Hansen and Essock, 2004).…”
Section: Lack Of Orientation Maps Despite Orientation Selectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Broadband stimuli are more naturalistic, and, under such conditions, humans showed least sensitivity toward horizontal orientations (horizontal effect) (Essock et al, 2003). The normalization may then serve to increase salience of statistically less prevalent content (vertical orientations) under natural viewing conditions (Hansen and Essock, 2004).…”
Section: Lack Of Orientation Maps Despite Orientation Selectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to know that the authors who used tasks that measure higher-level vision to study the oblique effect and conclude that it is defined by gravitational coordinates only employ head tilt, so that gravitational and patterncentric coordinates could not be parsed apart (Attneave & Olson, 1967;Buchanan-Smith & Heeley, 1993;Ferrante, Gerbino & Rock, 1995;Comerford, Javid & Thorn, 2000). The results here replicate authors who have specifically looked at patterncentric coordinates and found that the oblique effect pattern changes (Prather, 1997;Luyat et al, 2005;Meng & Qian, 2005 (Essock, DeFord, Hansen & Sinai, 2003). The theory behind this change is that with more information in the stimulus, the process of gain control is activated.…”
Section: Experiments 2: Visual Reference Frame Defining the Class 2 Obsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…There was no interaction between head tilt and orientation: Table 13) were analyzed. The data show us that the top-down cognition did not have an effect on the results as they are still "in-between" gravitational and retinal coordinates and do not shift (Essock, DeFord, Hansen & Sinai, 2003;Hansen & Essock, 2004;Essock, Haun & Kim 2009;Kim, Haun & Essock, 2010). It occurs with stimuli that are broadband, both in terms of in spatial frequency and orientation content, which I used in the matching task.…”
Section: Mean Standard Deviationmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…With regards to perceptual diVerences, greater sensitivity to vertical than to horizontal stimuli has been found with broad-band stimuli (Essock et al 2003;Hansen and Essock 2004). Essock et al suggest that this 'horizontal eVect' might act to minimize the perceptual saliency of the horizontal content that often predominates in natural scenes, thereby enhancing the relative salience of objects made up of a range of orientations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%