2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-014-2147-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oblique Orientation Discrimination Thresholds Are Superior in Those with a High Level of Autistic Traits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
41
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
41
3
Order By: Relevance
“…S4C). An attenuation of Bayesian priors thus correctly predicts reduced differences in sensitivity to cardinal and oblique orientations in autism (52).…”
Section: Simulation 3: Neural Implementation Of Bayesian Priorsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…S4C). An attenuation of Bayesian priors thus correctly predicts reduced differences in sensitivity to cardinal and oblique orientations in autism (52).…”
Section: Simulation 3: Neural Implementation Of Bayesian Priorsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…We have recently found that orientation discrimination thresholds are decreased in adults with ASD (Dickinson et al, 2016, although see Schwarzkopf, Anderson, de Haas, White, & Rees, 2014Shafai, Armstrong, Iarocci, & Oruc, 2015), and also that orientation discrimination thresholds correlate with autistic traits in the neurotypical population (Dickinson, Jones, & Milne, 2014). Inhibitory mechanisms are implicated in orientation discrimination as they are known to be involved in tuning the orientation selectivity of cells, as orientation selective neurons become narrowly tuned to a particular orientation through lateral inhibition (Hubel & Wiesel, 1968), and GABAergic inhibition has been shown to directly influence orientation discrimination ability.…”
Section: Perceptual Discriminationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This task was adapted from Edden and colleagues ), and was used by us in previous work (Dickinson et al 2014;Dickinson et al 2015). The task design is illustrated in Figure 1.…”
Section: Orientation Discrimination Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%