2016
DOI: 10.7554/elife.18164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obligate coupling of CFTR pore opening to tight nucleotide-binding domain dimerization

Abstract: In CFTR, the chloride channel mutated in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients, ATP-binding-induced dimerization of two cytosolic nucleotide binding domains (NBDs) opens the pore, and dimer disruption following ATP hydrolysis closes it. Spontaneous openings without ATP are rare in wild-type CFTR, but in certain CF mutants constitute the only gating mechanism, stimulated by ivacaftor, a clinically approved CFTR potentiator. The molecular motions underlying spontaneous gating are unclear. Here we correlate energetic cou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, the transition between opened and closed NBDs – and consequently – the transition between the IF and OF state likely occurs spontaneously by Brownian motion even in the absence of nucleotides. This was demonstrated previously by cross-linking experiments on TM287/288 (Hohl et al, 2012), cryo-EM studies on MsbA (Moeller et al, 2015) and for CFTR, which opens its pore spontaneously at low frequency even in the absence of nucleotides (Mihályi et al, 2016). To stabilize the closed NBD dimer by two sandwiched nucleotides resulting in an OF orientation of the TMDs (state 2 in Figure 10), a second nucleotide has to bind to the consensus site (state 1b) during the process of NBD closure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Instead, the transition between opened and closed NBDs – and consequently – the transition between the IF and OF state likely occurs spontaneously by Brownian motion even in the absence of nucleotides. This was demonstrated previously by cross-linking experiments on TM287/288 (Hohl et al, 2012), cryo-EM studies on MsbA (Moeller et al, 2015) and for CFTR, which opens its pore spontaneously at low frequency even in the absence of nucleotides (Mihályi et al, 2016). To stabilize the closed NBD dimer by two sandwiched nucleotides resulting in an OF orientation of the TMDs (state 2 in Figure 10), a second nucleotide has to bind to the consensus site (state 1b) during the process of NBD closure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Another interesting case where cytoplasmic regions control transport functioning directly occurs in prokaryotic ATPbinding cassette (ABC) transporters or the homologous human cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) chloride channel involved in cystic fibrosis [Gadsby et al 2006;Mihályi et al 2016, for a review see Locher (2016)]. In particular, in CFTR and other ABC transporters, ATP-bindingdependent dimerization of two cytosolic nucleotide-binding domains (NBDs) opens the pore, whereas dimer disruption following ATP hydrolysis closes it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phosphorylated WT CFTR channels open infrequently even in the absence of ATP ( Figure 6B , top current trace ), and such ‘spontaneous’ openings reflect occasional dimerization of empty, unliganded NBDs ( Mihályi et al, 2016 ) ( Figure 6B , top cartoon ). Comparison of such spontaneous gating of WT channels with the equilibrium gating of a hydrolysis-deficient mutant, such as the NBD2 Walker A lysine mutant K1250R, in saturating ATP ( Figure 6B , bottom current trace ) reveals two robust effects of bound ATP: a shortening of closed interburst durations ( Figure 6B , compare green bars above current traces) and a lengthening of open burst durations ( Figure 6B , compare red bars below current traces), both by >100 fold ( Mihályi et al, 2016 ). Thus, bound ATP reduces the energetic barrier for opening, but increases the barrier for non-hydrolytic closure ( Figure 6C , black vs. orange standard Gibbs energy profiles).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%