Objects, Meanings, and Role Identities: The Practices that Establish Association in the Case of Home‐Based Employment¹

Abstract

Contemporary social theory suggests that the meaning of any object differs by how we, as social actors, respond and relate to it. The challenge for sociology lies in exploring the different strategies and practices recursively and productively embedded in these relationships. In this article, I present data from in-depth interviews with 20 home-based employees to illustrate how these individuals interact with familiar objects in their surroundings to form anchor points for diverse lines of conduct. Although I draw from a number of sociological theories in my analyses, I further utilize cognitive theory to outline three micro-psychological practices (i.e., routinization, goal targeting, and emotional alignment) that respondents apply in their attempt to establish the desired association between objects and identities. In this way, the article both extends previous lines of inquiry into the relationship between objects and actors, and makes a new contribution to the growing literature on culture and cognition.

Making robots matter in dementia care: Conceptualising the triadic interaction between caregiver, resident and robot animal

“…46, 71) in their communication. Communication through significant symbols, whether verbal or non-verbal gestures, creates a shared world of symbolic meanings (Ashmore et al, 1994;Lynch, 2009;Preda, 1999). Focusing on the interaction between the material bodies of humans and robots, we find Mead's (1972Mead's ( /1938) notion of 'resistance' of particular interest.…”

“…46, 71) in their communication. Communication through significant symbols, whether verbal or non‐verbal gestures, creates a shared world of symbolic meanings (Ashmore et al., 1994; Lynch, 2009; Preda, 1999).…”

Cultural Objects, Material Culture, and Materiality

“…In addition to the powerful effects of the distributional availability of objects, material environments can both reproduce and dynamically alter social orders (Gieryn 2002). A city's material amenities can afford cultural support for artistic or religious practice and community, which in turn reconfigures neighborhoods (Lloyd 2006, Dugandzic 2022. Spaces are also arranged to persuade people to lines of thinking, as in the work of house stagers selling homes (Vercel 2021) or the Creation Museum's walk through the scientific evidence for the veracity of Bible's account of creation (Oberlin 2020).…”

Freedom of Expression Across Borders: Communication, Culture, and Language

“…hroughout history, humans have used every available means to survive by implementing their skills and abilities to build shelters out of the available resources, make weapons for hunting, fishing, and selfprotection, or simply as a decorative means like clothing and artwork. These material objects are socially and culturally dependent and embody an individual's cultural reality (Prown, 1982;Lynch, 2009;Woodward & Fisher, 2014).…”