2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision 2007
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2007.4408986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Objects in Context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
466
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 539 publications
(469 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
466
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, like [3][4][5], we choose to assign labels to superpixels, or regions produced by bottom-up segmentation. This not only reduces the complexity of the problem, but also gives better spatial support for aggregating features that could belong to a single object than, say, fixed-size square patches centered on every pixel in the image.…”
Section: Superpixel Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Instead, like [3][4][5], we choose to assign labels to superpixels, or regions produced by bottom-up segmentation. This not only reduces the complexity of the problem, but also gives better spatial support for aggregating features that could belong to a single object than, say, fixed-size square patches centered on every pixel in the image.…”
Section: Superpixel Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many state-of-the-art approaches encode such constraints with the help of conditional random field (CRF) models [1,6,4]. However, CRFs tend to be very costly both in terms of learning and inference.…”
Section: Contextual Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is a big conceptual difference with respect to approaches like [14,3]. It is also different from the CRF framework of [20], where pairwise cooccurrence frequencies are modeled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%