2019
DOI: 10.32849/2663-5313/2019.5.64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Objects created using artificial intelligence and artificial intelligence directly, and US copyright

Abstract: Катерина Міліцина, студентка магістратури Інституту міжнародних відносин Київського національного університету імені Тараса Шевченка ОБ'ЄКТИ, СТВОРЕНІ ЗА ДОПОМОГОЮ ШТУЧНОГО ІНТЕЛЕКТУ І ШТУЧНИМ ІНТЕЛЕКТОМ БЕЗПОСЕРЕДНЬО, ТА АВТОРСЬКЕ ПРАВО США З огляду на норми авторського права США, їх тлумачення та судову практику стаття досліджує об'єкти, створені за допомогою штучного інтелекту та штучним інтелектом безпосередньо, на предмет їх охороноздатності за авторським правом США. Також стаття присвячена огляду пропози… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Legal regulation of the use of artificial intelligence is of interest to many researchers, so in order to study the doctrine on intellectual property objects created by artificial intelligence the works of the following authors were analysed: Volina (2018), Vasilieva (2019), Karchevsky (2020), Krivetsky (2020), Lavrenova and Abramovich (2019), Milonenko (2018), Militsyna (2019, Pozova (2017), Svitlichny (2016), Semkiv and Shandra (2015), Harina (2019). All the works analysed below, in one way or another, influenced the formation of this article and the argumentation of the statements made by the authors at the end of the study.…”
Section: аNalysis Of Recent Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Legal regulation of the use of artificial intelligence is of interest to many researchers, so in order to study the doctrine on intellectual property objects created by artificial intelligence the works of the following authors were analysed: Volina (2018), Vasilieva (2019), Karchevsky (2020), Krivetsky (2020), Lavrenova and Abramovich (2019), Milonenko (2018), Militsyna (2019, Pozova (2017), Svitlichny (2016), Semkiv and Shandra (2015), Harina (2019). All the works analysed below, in one way or another, influenced the formation of this article and the argumentation of the statements made by the authors at the end of the study.…”
Section: аNalysis Of Recent Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the author notes that at the moment it is advisable to recognize artificial intelligence systems as special subjects of international law because the level of interaction of intelligent machines with humans already needs regulation. Militsyna (2019) compared the legal regulation of objects created with the help of artificial intelligence and artificial intelligence directly in Ukraine and the United States. Thus, the researcher pointed out that the question of the legal personality of artificial intelligence is on the agenda and that there are theories that insist that artificial intelligence already has manifestations of cognitive processes, so it has a consciousness that is similar to humans.…”
Section: аNalysis Of Recent Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%