Objects and Categories: Feature Statistics and Object Processing in the Ventral Stream

Abstract

Abstract■ Recognizing an object involves more than just visual analyses; its meaning must also be decoded. Extensive research has shown that processing the visual properties of objects relies on a hierarchically organized stream in ventral occipitotemporal cortex, with increasingly more complex visual features being coded from posterior to anterior sites culminating in the perirhinal cortex (PRC) in the anteromedial temporal lobe (aMTL). The neurobiological principles of the conceptual analysis of objects remain more controversial. Much research has focused on two neural regions-the fusiform gyrus and aMTL, both of which show semantic category differences, but of different types. fMRI studies show category differentiation in the fusiform gyrus, based on clusters of semantically similar objects, whereas category-specific deficits, specifically for living things, are associated with damage to the aMTL. These category-specific deficits for living things have been attributed to problems in differentiating between highly similar objects, a process that involves the PRC. To determine whether the PRC and the fusiform gyri contribute to different aspects of an objectʼs meaning, with differentiation between confusable objects in the PRC and categorization based on object similarity in the fusiform, we carried out an fMRI study of object processing based on a featurebased model that characterizes the degree of semantic similarity and difference between objects and object categories. Participants saw 388 objects for which feature statistic information was available and named the objects at the basic level while undergoing fMRI scanning. After controlling for the effects of visual information, we found that feature statistics that capture similarity between objects formed category clusters in fusiform gyri, such that objects with many shared features (typical of living things) were associated with activity in the lateral fusiform gyri whereas objects with fewer shared features (typical of nonliving things) were associated with activity in the medial fusiform gyri. Significantly, a feature statistic reflecting differentiation between highly similar objects, enabling object-specific representations, was associated with bilateral PRC activity. These results confirm that the statistical characteristics of conceptual object features are coded in the ventral stream, supporting a conceptual feature-based hierarchy, and integrating disparate findings of category responses in fusiform gyri and category deficits in aMTL into a unifying neurocognitive framework. ■

Neural microgenesis of personally familiar face recognition

“…However, our findings are also in agreement with more recent evidence suggesting that both structures, which are strongly connected with inferior temporal visual and prefrontal regions (27,(86)(87)(88), play a crucial role in perception (25,29,89) and assessment of "the significance of entities" (90). The perirhinal cortex, which codes feature conjunctions viewpoint-invariantly (91), is involved in complex visual discrimination (92,93) and has been proposed as an extension of the representational hierarchy in the ventral system (94)(95)(96)(97)(98). These characteristics, along with the anatomical location of the perirhinal cortex, render this structure ideally situated to link perception and semantic memory, as required for generation and maintenance of face representations for face individuation (26) and face discrimination across different viewpoints (30,31,99).…”

Reality TV and vicarious embarrassment: An fMRI study

“…The control N VE contrast revealed activity in areas that primarily deal with visual processing (e.g., Beauchamp et al, 1999;Fortin et al, 2002, Larsson et al, 2006Tyler et al, 2013). Bottom-up visual processing seems an unlikely explanation for the differences in cortical activation because visual stimuli in the two categories were carefully matched.…”

Medial temporal and neocortical contributions to remote memory for semantic narratives: Evidence from amnesia

“…Both neuropsychological (Moss, Rodd, Stamatakis, Bright, & Taylor, 2005; Wang, Lazzara, Ranganath, Knight, & Yonelinas, 2010) and imaging data (Moss, Rodd, Stamatakis, Bright, & Taylor, 2005; Tyler, et al, 2013) suggest a role for perirhinal cortex in semantic processing, raising the possibility that the impairment in detail generation in the MTL group might be due to damage to perirhinal cortex. Our results argue against this explanation, as the impairment in detail generation was also evident in two patients with volumetrically confirmed damage limited to the hippocampus.…”