2008
DOI: 10.2337/dc07-1795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Objectively Measured Sedentary Time, Physical Activity, and Metabolic Risk

Abstract: OBJECTIVE -We examined the associations of objectively measured sedentary time and physical activity with continuous indexes of metabolic risk in Australian adults without known diabetes.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS -An accelerometer was used to derive the percentage of monitoring time spent sedentary and in light-intensity and moderate-to-vigorousintensity activity, as well as mean activity intensity, in 169 Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab) participants (mean age 53.4 years). Associat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

73
706
13
10

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 915 publications
(820 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
73
706
13
10
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with previous observations that sedentary behavior was strongly associated with several glycemic traits,30, 31, 32 though its association with HbA 1c levels has not been well studied. A previous cross‐sectional study reported that objectively measured sedentary behavior showed a trend for association with elevated HbA 1c in 394 newly diagnosed adults with diabetes mellitus,10 whereas a recent study found that there were no cross‐sectional or 5‐year longitudinal associations between objectively measured sedentary time and HbA 1c in young adults 33.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with previous observations that sedentary behavior was strongly associated with several glycemic traits,30, 31, 32 though its association with HbA 1c levels has not been well studied. A previous cross‐sectional study reported that objectively measured sedentary behavior showed a trend for association with elevated HbA 1c in 394 newly diagnosed adults with diabetes mellitus,10 whereas a recent study found that there were no cross‐sectional or 5‐year longitudinal associations between objectively measured sedentary time and HbA 1c in young adults 33.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Further analysis confirmed the strong association between objectively measured sedentary behavior and triglyceride levels, which was previously observed in individuals both with and without diabetes mellitus 10, 22, 30, 32, 34, 35. This is consistent with the potential mechanism that reduced skeletal muscle contractions from prolonged sedentary behavior may depress uptake of plasma triglycerides and triglycerides‐derived fatty acid into skeletal muscle through suppression of lipoprotein lipase activity 36, 37.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…9,[21][22][23][24][25][26] For example, British researchers reported that each additional hour of sedentary time is associated with a 1.89cm larger WC in 30 to 80 year olds with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. 22 Although accelerometers may not directly measure sitting, these cumulative findings suggest associations between sedentary time and WC and BMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the true incidence of type 2 diabetes is likely to be under-reported, it has been estimated that by the year 2025, approximately 300 million people worldwide will be afflicted with this condition [3]. The proliferation of the rate of diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (and associated conditions) stems from the readiness of industrialised and developing nations alike to adopt a sedentary lifestyle in the face of excess energy intake [4][5][6][7]. While more than a half century of evidence from epidemiological, experimental and clinical trials pinpoints a positive correlation between dietary intake and disease risk, it has only recently been recognised that a physically inactive lifestyle rapidly initiates maladaptations that cause chronic disease [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%