Objectively Measured Physical Activity Levels and Associated Factors in Older US Women During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Study

Abstract

Background Physical activity (PA) is vital for attenuating the aging-related physiological and functional declines in women aged 60 years or above. However, little is known about the objectively assessed PA behavior in older women during the COVID-19 pandemic and its association with sociodemographics, health and physical function, and COVID-19 related factors. Objective This study aims to examine the objectively measured PA levels and associated factors among older US women who were living under the physical distancing guidelines during the second year of the pandemic. Methods In this cross-sectional study, we collected free-living PA data from 94 community-dwelling older women aged between 60 and 96 years (mean age 75.1 years, SD 7.3) using wrist-worn ActiGraph GT9X accelerometers between February and August 2021. We examined whether their daily duration spent in sedentary behavior (SB), light-intensity physical activity (LPA), and moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) varied by sociodemographic characteristics, health and physical function, and COVID-19 related factors. Results On average, participants accumulated 12.4 (SD 1.9) hours/day in SB, 218.6 (SD 64.3) minutes/day in LPA, and 42.4 (SD 31.0) minutes/day in MVPA, exhibiting overall reduced PA levels than previously published pre–COVID-19 norms of older US women. Among participants aged ≥80 years, sedentary time was 7.5% (P=.003) higher and the time spent in LPA and MVPA was, respectively, 13.3% (P=.03) and 44.9% (P<.001) lower than those aged 60-79 years. More MVPA participation and a less sedentary lifestyle were observed in those who had a higher self-rated health score (MVPA: P=.001, SB: P=.04) and lower fear of falling (FOF; MVPA: P=.003, SB: P=.04). Poorer performance in the 30-second sit-to-stand (STS) test was independently associated with more SB (P=.01) and less LPA (P=.04) and MVPA (P=.001) time among participants. In addition, sedentary time was 5.0% higher (P=.03) in frail and prefrail participants than their healthy counterparts. Conclusions During the pandemic, older women spent the majority of their waking time being sedentary, while LPA accounted for a larger portion of their daily PA. Therefore, replacing SB with LPA (rather than MVPA) might provide a more feasible PA target for older women, particularly those aged ≥80 years or who have reduced physical function. In addition, targeted interventions might be beneficial in promoting an active lifestyle for those who live alone, are prefrail or frail, and have a high FOF in older age. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR2-10.2196/27381

Associations between monitor-independent movement summary (MIMS) and fall risk appraisal combining fear of falling and physiological fall risk in community-dwelling older adults

“…Prior research has shown that FOF is associated with reduced PA levels in community-dwelling older adults using objectively measured PA data ( Jefferis et al, 2014 ; Choudhury et al, 2022 ). Our results broadly agree with it, showing that total daily PA volume was significantly lower in two high FOF groups (i.e., irrational and congruent) than the rational group.…”

Associations of Mutually Exclusive Categories of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior with Body Composition and Fall Risk in Older Women: A Cross-Sectional Study

“…Based on our study findings, it can be conferred that PA interventions to promote healthy body composition and dynamic balance in older adults should integrate approaches to combine both LPA and MVPA recommendations. Since LPA already accounts for a substantial portion of older adults’ daily activities [ 54 ], increasing LPA might provide a feasible target for enhancing the daily balance between sedentary time and total PA (i.e., LPA + MVPA) among older adults, especially for those with chronic diseases and geriatric conditions. Additionally, in our current sample, inactive-high sedentary participants had the least favorable outcomes in body composition profile.…”

Unveiling Fall Triggers in Older Adults: A Machine Learning Graphical Model Analysis

“…Details on each questionnaire and physical assessment are described in the following section. In addition, each individual was provided with a wrist-worn accelerometer and given instructions on how to wear it for 7 days [23]. The body composition was recorded using a portable bioelectrical impedance analysis device, and participants were instructed per the manufacturer's guidelines [5,24].…”