2014 Sixth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/qomex.2014.6982277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Objective visual quality assessment for 3D meshes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For more details on TPDM, readers can refer to [10], [17]. Another curvature based perceptual quality metric is proposed in [25]. It computes mean curvature and this computation results are adjusted further with a visual masking and saturation components.…”
Section: B Curvature-basedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For more details on TPDM, readers can refer to [10], [17]. Another curvature based perceptual quality metric is proposed in [25]. It computes mean curvature and this computation results are adjusted further with a visual masking and saturation components.…”
Section: B Curvature-basedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such techniques rather propose hypotheses, which are usually difficult to prove, about the overall behavior of the visual system in order to estimate how a specific visual artifact is perceived. Based on the observation that visual artifacts are less visible on rough regions than on smooth ones of a 3D mesh [19], several perceptual metrics have for instance been proposed [20], [21], [22]. Other features used by such top-down metrics include surface curvature [23], [24] and dihedral angle [25].…”
Section: Perceptually Driven Graphicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [32] proposed a fast mesh perceptual distance (FMPD) metric which considers the visual masking effect and psychometric saturation effect of the HVS. More recently, TPDM [33], DAME [34], [35] were proposed which also serve as reliable quality indicators for mesh models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%