2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): Review of literature and implications for nursing education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
264
0
13

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 287 publications
(298 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
9
264
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Its popularity as a major tool in the assessment of clinical competence is well documented as being specifically prominent in assessing situations where reliability and content validity are fundamental elements for making the results of such assessments justifiable to both examinees and external agencies (Newbel, 2004;Rushforth, 2007;Selim et al, 2011;El Darir & Abd El Hamid, 2013). The popularity of OSCE resulted from concerns that were raised about the traditional clinical and oral examinations used for assessing clinical competence (Rushforth, 2007;Holmboe & Hawkins, 2008;LevetteJones et al, 2010;Marwaha, 2011;El Darir & Abd El Hamid 2013). The concerns were triggered by the discovery of low correlations between examiners mark allocation, which resulted in unacceptable reliability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Its popularity as a major tool in the assessment of clinical competence is well documented as being specifically prominent in assessing situations where reliability and content validity are fundamental elements for making the results of such assessments justifiable to both examinees and external agencies (Newbel, 2004;Rushforth, 2007;Selim et al, 2011;El Darir & Abd El Hamid, 2013). The popularity of OSCE resulted from concerns that were raised about the traditional clinical and oral examinations used for assessing clinical competence (Rushforth, 2007;Holmboe & Hawkins, 2008;LevetteJones et al, 2010;Marwaha, 2011;El Darir & Abd El Hamid 2013). The concerns were triggered by the discovery of low correlations between examiners mark allocation, which resulted in unacceptable reliability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The duration, interconnectedness, number and order of OSCE stations need to be carefully examined in order to ensure that the potentially competing requirements of validity and reliability are balanced because they all affect students (Rushforth, 2007).…”
Section: Pre-testing Of Oscementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been viewed as the cornerstone of health care professional assessment for a number of years as it provides a standardised approach to assessment (Byrne and Smyth, 2008;Rushforth, 2007;Jefferies et al, 2007). However there are a number of limitations to this form of assessment for non-medical prescribing students.…”
Section: Osce and 'Live' Practice Based Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acerca de los ECOE, Rushfort recopila y sintetiza sus beneficios, de los que afirma poseen mayor objetividad que cualquier otra evaluación práctica, amplio rango de diferentes examinadores por lo tanto menor riesgo de parcialidad, menor riesgo de que los estudiantes sean evaluados por diferentes personas, visto positivamente por estudiantes y docentes, amplitud de habilidades evaluadas, se reduce la escogencia al azar y aumenta la igualdad de experiencias entre estudiantes, motivación para el aprendizaje, y alto nivel de confiabilidad y validez 11 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified