Objective Selection Criteria between ALT and Radial Forearm Flap in Oral Soft Tissues Reconstruction

Abstract

Different locoregional and free flaps were described for oral soft tissues reconstruction after oncological resections; however, free flaps remain the first choice. Among free flaps, the radial forearm flap (RFF) and the anterolateral thigh perforator flap (ALT) are preferred the most. The lack of standardization of the flap choice leaves the selection to the surgeon's experience. The purpose of our observational study is to provide an algorithm to support the flap choice for the reconstruction of oral soft tissues. Sixty patients with squamous cell carcinoma of oral soft tissues were enrolled in our study. All the patients underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to measure the three-dimensional size of the tumor. During the follow-up, the patients were evaluated by using the University of Washington-Quality of Life Questionnaire. The questionnaire score was better for small tumors and worse for large tumors in both functional and relational fields. We observed that most of the overlapping results were obtained for small defects and the choice of RFF, as well as for large defects and the use of ALT. We observed that in the preoperative time, it is possible to select which flap between radial forearm and ALT is more appropriate for oral soft tissues defects reconstruction, according to the size of the tumor evaluated by MRI. We propose a decisional algorithm that suggests the type of flap to use between ALT and RFF.

Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Recent Updates on Diagnosis, Severity and Available Treatments

“…Accurate physical examination and assessment of the lymphedema severity are essential to provide more predictable outcomes. A prompt management of the disease in a multidisciplinary team is the key to obtain good results [ 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 ]. Despite the fact lymphedema is still considered an incurable disease, in the last decade promising results with significant reduction of the limb swelling and improvement of psychosocial well-being have been shown.…”

Extended and unusual indications in jaw reconstruction with the fibula flap: An overview based on our 30-year experience

“…To overcome these limitations, in our hospital the surgical team include a senior consultant, a surgeon without great experience and a resident. Surgeries are performed with traditional techniques [ [34] , [35] , [36] , [37] , [38] , [39] , [40] , [41] , [42] , [43] ] and innovative methods [ [44] , [45] , [46] , [47] , [48] , [49] , [50] , [51] , [52] , [53] ] according to characteristics of the patient. An accurate selection of the case [ 54 ] is the key for successful application of new methods in terms of cost-effectiveness.…”

Upper limb traumatic injuries: A concise overview of reconstructive options

“…Of note, the surgical background can significantly interfere with the surgeon's choices in traumatic emergencies as well as in elective procedures both in hand and plastic surgery [ 37 ]. Different surgical aspects have to be taken into considerations when facing with the patient: detailed knowledge of the topic and all surgical solutions [ 38 ]; technical possibilities according to hospital class (hub or spoke center) and epidemiologic challenges such as emerging COVID-19 pandemic [ [39] , [40] , [41] , [42] ]; required instruments to perform microsurgery [ [43] , [44] , [45] , [46] , [47] ]; use of new technologies, innovative surgical methods and unconventional devices [ [48] , [49] , [50] , [51] , [52] ]; possibility to refer to skilled consultants; possibility to work in multi-equip with different specialists [ [53] , [54] , [55] , [56] , [57] , [58] ]; selection of high-risk surgical wound complications patients throughout available scores [ 59 , 60 ]; the help of skilled health professionals able to early detect possible complications and promptly start proper care and close follow-up [ 61 , 62 ]. …”