2005
DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200505001-01197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Objective Reference Values For Assessing Functional Recovery After Injuries In Amateur Soccer Players

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 shows the proposed list of 25 FPTs grouped by the predominant physical capacity. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] Each of the experts had to evaluate each one of the tests in a scale from 1 to 5 in relation to their suitability for injured football players in the last recovery phase. A 5 point score would correspond to "Very good suitability" and a 1 point score to "Very poor suitability".…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 1 shows the proposed list of 25 FPTs grouped by the predominant physical capacity. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] Each of the experts had to evaluate each one of the tests in a scale from 1 to 5 in relation to their suitability for injured football players in the last recovery phase. A 5 point score would correspond to "Very good suitability" and a 1 point score to "Very poor suitability".…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• The test should represent the relevant functional parameters to play football. [15] Triple hop test [15] Crossover hop test [15] Leap test [15] RM test [16] Hexagon test [17] CMJ [18] Endurance Cooper's test [19] 15´ test [20] Course navette [21] Probst test [22] Yo-Yo endurance test [23] Yo-Yo intermittent recovery [23] Sprints multiple test [23] Rockport walk test [24] Speed/agility Shuttle run 10 m [25] Shuttle run 8¥5 m [26] Illinois test [27] Barrow test (Zig-zag run test) [28] T test [29] Postural control Single leg balance test [30] Romberg test…”
Section: Battery Of Proposed Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By order of execution, the functional tests were: Y balance test [ 31 ], counter movement jump (CMJ) [ 32 ], single hop (SLHT) and triple hop (THT) [ 33 ], barrow test [ 34 ] and 8 × 5 m shuttle run sprint test [ 35 ] ( Figure 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A la hora de diferenciar entre distintas demarcaciones, los valores para cada grupo y prueba no presentaron diferencias significativas. Esto concordaría con lo encontrado por otros autores (Danelo et al, 2005).…”
Section: Análisis De Datosunclassified
“…9, n.º 1 / Murcia / Enero 2020 / Págs. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] Is a more exciting LaL Valoración funcional en futbolistas y su utilidad en la… SPORT TK, 9(1), [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] manera objetiva la predisposición anatómica y funcional del implicado para volver a los entrenamientos grupales (Lehr et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified