1988
DOI: 10.1109/49.601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Objective quality evaluation for low-bit-rate speech coding systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Their capability to effectively describe the listeners' auditory response is limited by the constraints of the speech production models. Over the last three decades, several spectral domain measures have been proposed in the literature, including the log likelihood ratio [14], Itakura-Saito distortion measure [15], and the cepstral distance [16]. The log likelihood ratio (LLR) …”
Section: Spectral Domain Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their capability to effectively describe the listeners' auditory response is limited by the constraints of the speech production models. Over the last three decades, several spectral domain measures have been proposed in the literature, including the log likelihood ratio [14], Itakura-Saito distortion measure [15], and the cepstral distance [16]. The log likelihood ratio (LLR) …”
Section: Spectral Domain Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality evaluation process is carried out by the comparison of the original and the degraded speech CEP distance [17], [8] is the estimate of log-spectrum distance between original and reconstructed speech and is computed by taking the log of spectrum and retransformed to time-domain. With this process the excitation signal of speech is separated from the convolved vocal tract characteristics.…”
Section: Perceptual Measurement 61pesqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its general applicability for speech quality evaluation has been discovered by Kitawaki et al [6], who compared elementary objective speech quality measures for voiceband codecs. The cepstral distance revealed the best correspondence to the mean opinion score among all objective measures studied.…”
Section: B Evaluation Methodology Based On Elementary Objective Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This correlation performance has been further verified for waveform preserving codecs and for the MNRU, which is one of the most common reference conditions for subjective and objective voice quality assessments, as part of the recent study by Voran [2]. Because of its widely verified correlation performance to subjective hearing tests, we use the results of the fundamental study [6] to predict the mean opinion score from the cepstral distance, as detailed shortly.…”
Section: B Evaluation Methodology Based On Elementary Objective Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%