2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Objective Pupillometry as an Adjunct to Prediction and Assessment for Oculomotor Nerve Injury and Recovery: Potential for Practical Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 2 , 3 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 15 ] Complete recovery from isolated, traumatic oculomotor nerve palsy is generally rare. [ 1 , 10 , 17 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 2 , 3 , 6 , 8 , 9 , 15 ] Complete recovery from isolated, traumatic oculomotor nerve palsy is generally rare. [ 1 , 10 , 17 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2,3,6,8,9,15] Complete recovery from isolated, traumatic oculomotor nerve palsy is generally rare. [1,10,17] Here, we report a unique case of oculomotor nerve palsy, presumably caused by compression of a cisternal drain placed during surgery for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in pupil size and reactivity can provide early recognition of neurological decline and facilitate lifesaving interventions. [1][2][3][4] The standard of practice to evaluate PLR uses manual use of a penlight or similar light source; however, this method has low interrater reliability and intrarater consistency. 3 Automated infrared pupillometry (AIP) has greater reliability to obtain objective and accurate measurements of pupillary size and reactivity to light using the Neurological Pupil index (NPi).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessing the pupillary light reflex (PLR) is a core component of neurological assessments. Changes in pupil size and reactivity can provide early recognition of neurological decline and facilitate lifesaving interventions 1–4. The standard of practice to evaluate PLR uses manual use of a penlight or similar light source; however, this method has low interrater reliability and intrarater consistency 3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%