2017
DOI: 10.1525/irqr.2017.10.2.128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Objective Measures and Subjective Reports

Abstract: The paper discusses how visual research methods that draw on ethnomethodology and conversation analysis can help sociologists to reveal how optometrists' assess the clarity of their clients' distance vision. It argues that the detailed analysis of video-recorded interactions in optometric consultation rooms can help reveal the practical organization of the 'routine' work through which optometrists examine and assess their clients' sight. Save for the contribution of the paper to methodological discussions abou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anthropologists, sociologists, and geographers are amongst those social scientists emphasizing how sensory experience is shaped via socio-cultural frameworks, but vision has only rarely been analyzed as a sociological phenomenon, produced in social interaction (Simmel 1970;Sudnow 1972;Weinstein and Weinstein 1984). Ethnomethodologists, in contrast, have developed a small, but rich corpus of work that examines seeing as intricate, complex, and interactionally achieved (e.g., Corsby and Jones 2020;Sharrock and Coulter 1998;vom Lehn et al 2017). Thus, "doing seeing" and the development of a distinctive "vis-ability" (Schindler 2018) as a skilled way of seeing, relevant to the specific task at hand, are achieved in very different ways by different social groups.…”
Section: Vision and Intercorporealitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anthropologists, sociologists, and geographers are amongst those social scientists emphasizing how sensory experience is shaped via socio-cultural frameworks, but vision has only rarely been analyzed as a sociological phenomenon, produced in social interaction (Simmel 1970;Sudnow 1972;Weinstein and Weinstein 1984). Ethnomethodologists, in contrast, have developed a small, but rich corpus of work that examines seeing as intricate, complex, and interactionally achieved (e.g., Corsby and Jones 2020;Sharrock and Coulter 1998;vom Lehn et al 2017). Thus, "doing seeing" and the development of a distinctive "vis-ability" (Schindler 2018) as a skilled way of seeing, relevant to the specific task at hand, are achieved in very different ways by different social groups.…”
Section: Vision and Intercorporealitymentioning
confidence: 99%