2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2021.108556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Objective measurement technologies for transforming the Australian & New Zealand livestock industries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lean meat yield is a negative predictor while intramuscular fat, a positive predictor (Pannier et al, 2018) and so reliable estimates for these as carcass grading parameters are now a high industry priority. Measuring intramuscular fat at line speed in whole lamb carcasses on the kill floor is the most preferable operation from an abattoir perspective, although camera systems assessing a cut surface in chilled carcasses/cuts might also be possible to incorporate (Gardner et al, 2021). A combination of carcass grading data for lean meat yield and intramuscular fat, carcass weight, meat aging time and pH/temperature decline postslaughter will form the predictors for a lamb cut  cook model similar to MSA beef system.…”
Section: Carcass Grading For Lamb Eating Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lean meat yield is a negative predictor while intramuscular fat, a positive predictor (Pannier et al, 2018) and so reliable estimates for these as carcass grading parameters are now a high industry priority. Measuring intramuscular fat at line speed in whole lamb carcasses on the kill floor is the most preferable operation from an abattoir perspective, although camera systems assessing a cut surface in chilled carcasses/cuts might also be possible to incorporate (Gardner et al, 2021). A combination of carcass grading data for lean meat yield and intramuscular fat, carcass weight, meat aging time and pH/temperature decline postslaughter will form the predictors for a lamb cut  cook model similar to MSA beef system.…”
Section: Carcass Grading For Lamb Eating Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent review of the development, calibration, and validation of objective measurement technologies for carcass composition, lean, fat, and meat-eating quality traits in the Australian and New Zealand livestock industries, Gardner et al [5] highlighted the inherent difficulties associated with the poor measurement of meat-eating quality and lean meat yield. Attempts to predict IMF [6][7][8], intramuscular connective tissue [9], composition and quality characteristics [10], tenderness, ultimate pH, and IMF content [11][12][13] from near infra-red based regression equations were characterized by low accuracy, inconsistency, and divergence between calibration and validation data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts to predict IMF [6][7][8], intramuscular connective tissue [9], composition and quality characteristics [10], tenderness, ultimate pH, and IMF content [11][12][13] from near infra-red based regression equations were characterized by low accuracy, inconsistency, and divergence between calibration and validation data. Such inaccuracies lead to lamb inefficiencies and an estimated annual value-chain wastage costs of $130 million to the Australian beef industry [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, measuring these meat quality traits is expensive as data are acquired after the animal is dead. Furthermore, current technologies developed to measure meat eating quality characteristics have low precision and high inconsistency, characterized by a wide divergence between calibration and validation data [ 23 ]. Such inaccuracies and low precision in the measurement of meat quality attributes cost the Australian beef industry AUD 130 million per year [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, current technologies developed to measure meat eating quality characteristics have low precision and high inconsistency, characterized by a wide divergence between calibration and validation data [ 23 ]. Such inaccuracies and low precision in the measurement of meat quality attributes cost the Australian beef industry AUD 130 million per year [ 23 ]. Other previously proposed methods for predicting IMF and fatty acid composition in beef include the Bayesian-based Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNP) Best Linear Unbiased Predictor, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator, and X-ray absorptiometry scanner methods [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%