2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icorr.2011.5975430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Objective measurement of synergistic movement patterns of the upper extremity following stroke: An explorative study

Abstract: The majority of stroke survivors have to cope with deficits in arm function, which is often monitored with subjective clinical scales during stroke rehabilitation. The aim of this study is to examine whether robotic outcome measures obtained during circle drawing are suitable to objectively measure upper extremity function of stroke survivors, especially regarding synergistic movement patterns. Stroke survivors (n = 16) and healthy subjects (n = 20) drew circles, as big and as round as possible, above a table … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mirbagheri and Rymer (2008) showed that changes in elbow kinematics followed a similar pat-tern to that of clinical recovery evaluated using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment. However, other authors (Zollo et al, 2011) showed that kinematic measures were only moderately correlated with Fugl-Meyer scores, particularly with the proximal part of the FMA upper extremity scores (Krabben, Prange, Molier, Rietman, & Buurke, 2011;Subramanian, Yamanaka, Chilingaryan, & Levin, 2010). Our results suggest that end-effector robots may not be so appropriate to measure metrics related to motor recovery beyond the very first weeks post stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Mirbagheri and Rymer (2008) showed that changes in elbow kinematics followed a similar pat-tern to that of clinical recovery evaluated using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment. However, other authors (Zollo et al, 2011) showed that kinematic measures were only moderately correlated with Fugl-Meyer scores, particularly with the proximal part of the FMA upper extremity scores (Krabben, Prange, Molier, Rietman, & Buurke, 2011;Subramanian, Yamanaka, Chilingaryan, & Levin, 2010). Our results suggest that end-effector robots may not be so appropriate to measure metrics related to motor recovery beyond the very first weeks post stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Coordination of proximal and distal musculature is essential for functional movements with the upper limb. Circle drawing metrics have been used to investigate abnormal synergistic movement patterns that can develop after stroke (Dipietro et al, 2007, Krabben et al, 2011a, Krabben et al, 2011b. The neurophysiological after-effects of tDCS were examined using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and peripheral nerve stimulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rehabilitation robotics has gained a lot of attention in quantification of motor functionality due to its ability to offer objective and repeatable therapy treatment [32]–[38]. Linear regression model-based kinematic scales were developed using the MIT-Manus robot to achieve highly a repeatable and high resolution framework for quantification of motor performance [39].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%