2011 International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icdar.2011.125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Objective Function Design for MCE-Based Combination of On-line and Off-line Character Recognizers for On-line Handwritten Japanese Text Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is computationally expensive since the neighborhood relationships must be examined in two dimensions. Although the method introducing temporal information is very sensitive to stroke order variations, it is efficient in recognition speed, and combining it with an un-structural method can deal with the strokeorder variations [27,28]. Even for the one-dimensional neighborhood relationships applying MRFs instead of HMMs to integrate the information of binary features between the successively adjacent feature vectors in writing or position order can improve performance.…”
Section: Site: Feature Points From An Input Pattern S={s1 S2 S3…s12}mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is computationally expensive since the neighborhood relationships must be examined in two dimensions. Although the method introducing temporal information is very sensitive to stroke order variations, it is efficient in recognition speed, and combining it with an un-structural method can deal with the strokeorder variations [27,28]. Even for the one-dimensional neighborhood relationships applying MRFs instead of HMMs to integrate the information of binary features between the successively adjacent feature vectors in writing or position order can improve performance.…”
Section: Site: Feature Points From An Input Pattern S={s1 S2 S3…s12}mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, un-structural methods are robust against noises but very weak against character shape variations. By combining a structural method (structural recognizer) with an un-structural method (un-structural recognizer), the recognition accuracy improves since they compensate for their respective disadvantages [27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employing the combination of on-line and off-line recognition methods for character recognition [12], each candidate character pattern is associated with a number of candidate classes with confidence scores. All the possible segmentations and recognition candidate classes are represented by a src-lattice as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Candidate Lattice Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A combined classifier of the two above is formed by a sum rule in which the total score of a combined classifier is derived by adding two classifiers. Their weighting parameters have been optimized by the minimum classification error (MCE) criterion [34].…”
Section: Similarity Measurementioning
confidence: 99%