2015
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2015.2421518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Objective Evaluation Criteria for Stereo Camera Shooting Quality Under Different Shooting Parameters and Shooting Distances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SVBL 3D IQA Database contains 360 distorted stereopairs and 30 original stereopairs. Each stereoscopic image in this database has been evaluated by human subjects, and assigned a quantitative subjective quality score [74].…”
Section: Stereoscopic Image Quality Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SVBL 3D IQA Database contains 360 distorted stereopairs and 30 original stereopairs. Each stereoscopic image in this database has been evaluated by human subjects, and assigned a quantitative subjective quality score [74].…”
Section: Stereoscopic Image Quality Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it also brings us many new issues and challenges [1] [2] [3]. During the process of stereoscopic content creation, transmission, processing and display, various distortions that affect the quality perception may be introduced [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[57]) to include many asymmetric stereo images. In our recent work [54], we proposed an evaluation criteria for stereo camera shooting quality. All reference stereopairs we shot for our database followed our criteria to make sure all of our reference stereopairs are of a good quality.…”
Section: Impacts Of the Disparity Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the weight of teaching quality evaluation index is determine using AHP, and screening is conducted based on weights so as to obtain five indicators of teaching purposes [13], teaching tools and means; processing of difficult and focal points; completion of teaching plan; students' grasp of teaching content and so on. Then, normalization processing of these five indicators is carried out, and the normalized data and the actual results of the evaluation are formed into a new data set [14].…”
Section: Model Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%