“…Specifically, the 5Ds framework tries to delineate the built environment from 5 dimensions, including density, diversity (land-use mix), design (pedestrian-friendly design), destination accessibility, and distance to the transit (Ewing & Cervero, 2001, 2010Ewing et al, 2009). In general, higher density (population and employment) (Bentley et al, 2018), higher land-use mix (Wang et al, 2021), better design (often measured by intersection density) (Kang, 2017;Koohsari et al, 2017), higher destination accessibility (distance to CBD) (Chudyk et al, 2015;Ewing et al, 2015), and a shorter distance to transit (Kang, 2018;Wang & Cao, 2017) are widely found to be associated with a higher frequency or longer duration of walking. However, inconsistencies and discrepancies exist, mainly due to the differences between developed and developing contexts (Boakye-Dankwa, Barnett et al, 2019;Boakye-Dankwa, Nathan, et al, 2019;Lu et al, 2018;Lu et al, 2017), which entails more studies in the understudied developing context.…”