Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.10.089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Objective criteria for acceptability and constancy tests of digital subtraction angiography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Equation ( 5), extracted from article [9], ROI represents the average pixel value within an object of interest that has higher attenuation than the background, while Bg corresponds to the mean value of the background itself. SD Bg denotes the standard deviation of the pixels belonging to the background.…”
Section: Cnr Objective Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In Equation ( 5), extracted from article [9], ROI represents the average pixel value within an object of interest that has higher attenuation than the background, while Bg corresponds to the mean value of the background itself. SD Bg denotes the standard deviation of the pixels belonging to the background.…”
Section: Cnr Objective Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A higher CNR value indicates a greater ability to distinguish objects such as guide wires or stents within blood vessels. Calculating CNR enables an objective evaluation of the visibility of these vessels against the background's quantum noise [9,11].…”
Section: Cnrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations