Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Objective assessment of videoconferenced lectures in a surgical clerkship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of these, four randomised controlled studies [8][9][10][11] and nine comparative studies [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] were identified as measuring learning outcomes of telelearning versus traditional face-to-face education. The remaining 34 papers were either descriptive observational studies or did not measure tele-learning versus face-to-face education and so were excluded from the review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of these, four randomised controlled studies [8][9][10][11] and nine comparative studies [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] were identified as measuring learning outcomes of telelearning versus traditional face-to-face education. The remaining 34 papers were either descriptive observational studies or did not measure tele-learning versus face-to-face education and so were excluded from the review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…studies 8 delivered PowerPoint materials to remote participants via the internet. The first study 8 involved 110 surgical clerkship students, however only 12 of these students participated in the videoconferencing intervention. The second study 9 involved 15 community nurses, with the low sample sizes attributed to recruitment and facility capacity limitations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most papers described the use of technology in their medical school and few measured the impact of learning. The literature highlighted the feature of mobile learning as bridging distances, creating links, preventing feelings of isolation in students [5][6][7][8][9], and challenging faculty to develop skills to incorporate and troubleshoot technology on distributed sites and produce e-resources [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) there appears to be no significant difference in academic performance following video-linked lectures when compared with face-to-face lectures (Soloman et al 2004;Stain et al 2005); 2) video-linked lectures seem to be an acceptable alternative to face-to-face delivery (Callas et al 2004;Whitten et al 2005;Mattick, Crocker, and Bligh 2007); and 3) fears that making educational materials available online will have a negative impact on student attendance at live events are probably unfounded (BillingsGagliardi and Mazor 2007;Mattick, Crocker, and Bligh 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%