2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12984-021-00897-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Objective assessment of impulse control disorder in patients with Parkinson’s disease using a low-cost LEGO-like EEG headset: a feasibility study

Abstract: Background Patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) can develop impulse control disorders (ICDs) while undergoing a pharmacological treatment for motor control dysfunctions with a dopamine agonist (DA). Conventional clinical interviews or questionnaires can be biased and may not accurately diagnose at the early stage. A wearable electroencephalogram (EEG)-sensing headset paired with an examination procedure can be a potential user-friendly method to explore ICD-related signatures that can detect … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of EEG sensors suggests the possibility of objectively studying the cognitive decline in a neurodegenerative disease like Parkinson's. Based on this idea, a customized low-cost LEGO-like EEG sensing headset coupled with an assessment procedure has been proposed in [85] that can detect early symptoms and advancement in stages of PD by assessing brain activity and comparing responses with standard ICD indicating markers. Reference [36] is a comprehensive, fully integrated proposal of a system involving data capture via multiple sensors and processing based on multiple sensing technologies.…”
Section: ) Impulse Control Disordermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of EEG sensors suggests the possibility of objectively studying the cognitive decline in a neurodegenerative disease like Parkinson's. Based on this idea, a customized low-cost LEGO-like EEG sensing headset coupled with an assessment procedure has been proposed in [85] that can detect early symptoms and advancement in stages of PD by assessing brain activity and comparing responses with standard ICD indicating markers. Reference [36] is a comprehensive, fully integrated proposal of a system involving data capture via multiple sensors and processing based on multiple sensing technologies.…”
Section: ) Impulse Control Disordermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is a follow-up to a previous study [13] that preliminarily assessed temporal event-related potential (ERP) signatures of ICD severity in patients with PD using a simple univariate linear regression analysis. We followed the same experimental protocol and data-collection setup to obtain data from a few more subjects and then demonstrated the applicability of a multivariate machine-learning approach to assess PD and ICD comorbidities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human brain imaging and mapping techniques that analyze brain signals with or without task engagement of interest, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) [7,12] and electroencephalography (EEG) [5,8,13], may shed light on qualitatively and quantitatively probing the underlying neural mechanisms of active ICDs in patients with PD. Despite the unique merits of different imaging modalities in terms of spatial and temporal details, their reports share common evidence that alternation or abnormality of brain activation in the frontal lobe is associated with impairment of inhibitory control (i.e., cognitive and motor impulsivity) in patients with PD and ICD symptoms compared with patients with typical PD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, response inhibition requires topdown modulation of cognitive control to withhold motor responses to non-target stimuli. The N2 and P3 components were two obvious electrophysiological markers induced by successful inhibition to Nogo stimuli in a Go-Nogo task [25][26][27]. The N2 component peaks around 200 to 300 ms over the frontocentral region, and its amplitude is found to be larger in the responses to Nogo than Go stimuli; the P3 component, occurring around 300 to 600 ms after the stimulus onset, is observed in the parietal region in responses to Go stimuli and in the frontocentral region in responses to Nogo stimuli [28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%