Objective and subjective results following implantation of the FineVision trifocal intraocular lens in Mexican patients

Ferreira-Rios, Ivo; Zuñiga-Posselt, Karla; Serna‐Ojeda, Juan Carlos; Chávez-Mondragón, Eduardo

doi:10.1007/s10792-017-0725-x

Cited by 11 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In this study the mean monocular postoperative UDVA was 0.964 (0.8 -1) decimal (nearly 0.05 [0.1 -0.0] logMAR), this confirms the effectiveness of the evaluated lens in restoring far vision after lens removal. In our study, the post-operation results of UDVA were better than other studies [2,5,15,16] . The better visual results in our study were clear with significant variations of symptoms of refraction.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 67%

“…The tools, procedures and intraocular lens use in it are developing [1,2] . So the intraocular lens (multifocal) project and its development lead to improve visual acuity, the satisfaction of patients and life quality [3,4] . While Old-style lens use for a near or far vision for clearing it while multifocal lens use for clearing both near and far vision 2.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Efficacy of trifocal intraocular lens: visual outcomes and patient satisfaction

Mohamad¹,

Mahdi²,

YousifAlzubaidi³

2020

ATMPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Phacoemulsification is gaining popularity for cataract removal and refractive lens exchange, and the continued evolution of equipment, techniques and intraocular lens. Multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) design, has resulted in the evolution of postoperative goals to include not only visual restoration but to improve patient satisfaction as well as visual outcomes and quality of life. The aim is to evaluate visual and refractive results following implantation of a trifocal diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) and to determine patient satisfaction and glasses independence. This was a prospective study enrolling 74 eyes of 42 patients undergoing lens removal surgery with implantation of trifocal diffractive Medicontur IOL (Liberty). Visual and refractive outcomes were evaluated preoperatively and 6-month postoperatively. Patient satisfaction, spectacle use, photic phenomena presence, and ease of performance of vision-related activities were assessed via questionnaire. 74 patients included in this study entirely patients finished the 6-month after surgery. 77% were males and 23% females, 84% of them with age ≤ 30 years old and 16% > 30 years old mean range of age (45.04 ± 12.3) years (19-69 years). 99% of them with glare absent while 99% of patient with no eyes discomfort, (100%) did not require glasses for near or far vision postoperatively, This table show difference between visual acuity of patients after and before surgery (P-value< 0.05), so there is a difference between VA for near before and after surgery, there was difference between refraction after and before surgery (P-value< 0.05) and refraction in spherical is better after surgery. In conclusion, implantation of the Medicontur trifocal IOL (Liberty) after lens removal surgery restores visual acuity with a minimal level of photic phenomena, better to doing normal everyday actions with no glasses, and with good satisfaction of patients after operation.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 67%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficacy of trifocal intraocular lens: visual outcomes and patient satisfaction

Mohamad¹,

Mahdi²,

YousifAlzubaidi³

2020

ATMPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[8][9][10][11][12][13][14] In the past, the FineVision optical design has also proven its effectiveness in numerous clinical studies with the hydrophilic Micro F IOL model (PhysIOL, Liége, Belgium). 13,14,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25] Unlike double-C-loop POD lenses, the Micro F IOL has a four-loop haptic design. Compared to extended depth of focus (EDOF) lenses, FineVision IOLs performed statistically significantly better in terms of uncorrected near vision.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

<p>Comparison of Visual Performance and Patient Satisfaction Outcomes with Two Trifocal IOLs with Similar Optical Design but Different Materials</p>

Poyales¹,

Pérez²,

López-Brea³

et al. 2020

OPTH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: To compare clinical outcomes in a prospective trial of cataract surgery patients bilaterally implanted with two different trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) with very similar optical designs but consisting of different IOL materials (hydrophobic and hydrophilic). Patients and Methods: Fifty-one patients (102 eyes) were randomized to receive trifocal IOLs bilaterally-FineVision POD F (hydrophilic) or FineVision POD F GF (hydrophobic) (both PhysIOL, Liége, Belgium). The follow-up period was 3 months. Outcome measurements included uncorrected distance (UDVA), corrected distance (CDVA), distance-corrected intermediate (DCIVA), and distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), refraction, negative dysphotopsia, optical quality of vision, contrast sensitivity under photopic and mesopic conditions, halometry (discrimination index), and patient-reported outcomes. Results: At the final study visit, mean (SD) values for binocular UDVA, CDVA, DCIVA (80 cm), and DCNVA (40 cm) were −0.01 (0.06), −0.04 (0.04), 0.09 (0.10), and 0.10 (0.09) logMAR, respectively, for POD F, and 0.01 (0.08), −0.03 (0.03), 0.08 (0.1), and 0.13 (0.11) respectively, for POD F GF. Defocus assessments showed a continuous curve with a functional range of visual acuity (≤0.15 logMAR) from ~30 cm to infinity in both groups. The discrimination index was >0.85 for all patients, and both groups showed similar contrast sensitivity under photopic and mesopic conditions. At 3 months, no patient reported negative dysphotopsia, and high satisfaction rates were observed. Conclusion: Clinical outcomes showed no significant difference between each lens when measured at 1 month and 3 months after implantation. This equally good clinical performance of hydrophilic and hydrophobic trifocal lenses allows the surgeon to choose the IOL material based on personal preferences or patients' needs.

show abstract

“…Sin embargo, la visión clara, cercana y lejana por sí sola no siempre es suficiente para la vida cotidiana, ya que la visión intermedia (50 a 70 cm) desempeña un papel fundamental en las actividades diarias de la mayoría de las personas, especialmente dado el creciente uso de tabletas y computadoras. 20 Con ese fin, el lente trifocal difractivo y asférico FineVision (PhysIOL, Liege, Bélgica) se diseñó para incluir un tercer punto focal en su óptica multifocal. El objetivo era proporcionar tres distancias focales útiles: cercana, intermedia y lejana.…”

Section: Marco Teóricounclassified

“…La experiencia clínica inicial, en su mayor parte en Europa, con la implantación de este LIO ha demostrado que proporciona una buena agudeza visual lejana, intermedia y cercana, con altas tasas de satisfacción del paciente. 20 Este lente contiene dos zonas difractivas superpuestas (una para Distancia y visión cercana y una para distancia e intermedia. 21…”

Section: Marco Teóricounclassified

Visual Performance With Bifocal and Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lenses: A Prospective Three-Armed Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial

Kaymak¹,

Breyer²,

Alió³

et al. 2017

J Refract Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Objective and subjective results following implantation of the FineVision trifocal intraocular lens in Mexican patients

Abstract: Implantation of a diffractive trifocal IOL in a Mexican population appears safe and effective, both objectively and subjectively. Good uncorrected visual acuity outcomes were achieved at far, near, and intermediate distances. Overall patient satisfaction was excellent.

Cited by 11 publications

References 11 publications

Efficacy of trifocal intraocular lens: visual outcomes and patient satisfaction

Efficacy of trifocal intraocular lens: visual outcomes and patient satisfaction

<p>Comparison of Visual Performance and Patient Satisfaction Outcomes with Two Trifocal IOLs with Similar Optical Design but Different Materials</p>

Visual Performance With Bifocal and Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lenses: A Prospective Three-Armed Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About