2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Objective and specific tracking of anhedonia via event-related potentials in individuals with cocaine use disorders

Abstract: Background Hyposensitivity to non-drug reward, behaviorally manifested as anhedonia, is a hallmark of chronic substance use. Anhedonia is a transdiagnostic symptom underpinned by neurobiochemical disturbances in the reward circuit, yet an objective measure to assess anhedonia severity still eludes the field. We hypothesized that the Reward Positivity (RewP) component of the event-related potentials (ERPs) will specifically track anhedonia as the RewP is attributed to the same brain regions that are also implic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An exploration of whether persistence and reward sensitivity were associated with task performance, RewP amplitude, and FMT power failed to reveal any significant relations among them (see Supplementary Table 1). Although a number of studies have reported individual differences in personality associated with RewP amplitude (e.g., Bress andHajcak, 2013, Cooper et al, 2014;Liu et al, 2014;Parvaz et al, 2016;Umemoto and Holroyd, 2017) and phasic FMT power (e.g., Cavanagh and Shackman, 2014), we did not replicate any of these findings. Nevertheless, such effects may have been obscured by the low statistical power in the present study for conducting analyses related to individual differences.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An exploration of whether persistence and reward sensitivity were associated with task performance, RewP amplitude, and FMT power failed to reveal any significant relations among them (see Supplementary Table 1). Although a number of studies have reported individual differences in personality associated with RewP amplitude (e.g., Bress andHajcak, 2013, Cooper et al, 2014;Liu et al, 2014;Parvaz et al, 2016;Umemoto and Holroyd, 2017) and phasic FMT power (e.g., Cavanagh and Shackman, 2014), we did not replicate any of these findings. Nevertheless, such effects may have been obscured by the low statistical power in the present study for conducting analyses related to individual differences.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…Given the inverse problem, the neural source of the RewP is less clear, but the balance of evidence suggests that it is produced in anterior midcingulate cortex (e.g., Miltner et al, 1997;Becker et al, 2014; but see Proudfit, 2015). Of particular relevance to this study, RewP amplitude correlates positively with individual differences in reward sensitivity (Bress andHajcak, 2013, Umemoto and; see also Cooper et al, 2014;Liu et al, 2014;Parvaz et al, 2016), and negatively with individual differences in depression levels (e.g., Umemoto and Holroyd, 2017;Proudfit, 2015), which suggests that the RewP may index subjective levels of reward valuation (see Holroyd and Umemoto, 2016 for review).…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Parvaz et al used a gambling task predicting whether they would win or lose money on each trial, while ERP data were required (40). Reward Positivity component (RewP) in response to predicted win trials was extracted from the ERPs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We predicted that participants who self-report high reward sensitivity would exhibit a relatively large feedback related RewP (Bress and Hajcak, 2013;Cooper et al, 2014;Liu et al, 2014;Parvaz et al, 2016), whereas those high in depression-related personality traits would exhibit a small feedbackrelated RewP (Proudfit, 2015).…”
Section: Umemoto Andmentioning
confidence: 99%