2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2021.102367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Object-space optimization of tomographic reconstructions for additive manufacturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Digital light projections were computed and optimized with the object‐space model optimization algorithm [ 41 ] using forward and inverse models which account for light occlusion by the insert [ 42 ] (Figure 5b). The insert was suspended in the gel (Figure 5c) in a two‐step process: first, a small amount of liquefied 7 wt% gel was dispensed into the container and allowed to cool; second, the insert was embedded in the gel and more liquefied gel was dispensed to cover the insert completely.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digital light projections were computed and optimized with the object‐space model optimization algorithm [ 41 ] using forward and inverse models which account for light occlusion by the insert [ 42 ] (Figure 5b). The insert was suspended in the gel (Figure 5c) in a two‐step process: first, a small amount of liquefied 7 wt% gel was dispensed into the container and allowed to cool; second, the insert was embedded in the gel and more liquefied gel was dispensed to cover the insert completely.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 7 , 9 ] As any projection‐based printing system, the final resolution of the printed structure is theoretically determined by the effective pixel size of the DMD at the center of the build volume. Gray‐scale tomographic reconstruction algorithms have been used to improve print resolution [ 12 , 17 ] or print stiffness. [ 14 ] In practice, the final resolution of the prints is also affected by the polymerization process of the resin and potential optical aberrations inherent to the experimental setup.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goodness of the algorithm is essential to produce patterns whose back-projections form a volumetric dose of light that best represents the target object inside the resin. Several recent works have been proposed to optimize the set of patterns with respect to (1) the target dose by including physics priors 18,19 or (2) more appropriate loss functions that enhance contrast 20 . With regard to the resin's opacity, it is clear that optically transparent materials allow for propagating sharp patterns of high-fidelity, but the same patterns would be inevitably blurred and thus lose its finest features in scattering media.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%