2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2007.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Object scrambling and finiteness in Turkish agrammatic production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the data indicated that grammatical complexity in Turkish agrammatic aphasia, as measured by mean length of verbs, is considerably reduced. Consistent with the above spontaneous speech study, experimental sentence production studies have shown that sentence-level processing in grammatically complex structures is challenging for agrammatic Turkish speakers (Yarbay-Duman, Aygen, Özgirgin, & Bastiaanse, 2007). In particular, producing and comprehending subject and object relatives, where non-finite verbs are used, pose difficulties to Turkish agrammatic speakers (Aydın, 2007;Yarbay-Duman, Aygen, & Bastiaanse, 2008).…”
Section: Agrammatic Aphasia In Turkish Individualssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Moreover, the data indicated that grammatical complexity in Turkish agrammatic aphasia, as measured by mean length of verbs, is considerably reduced. Consistent with the above spontaneous speech study, experimental sentence production studies have shown that sentence-level processing in grammatically complex structures is challenging for agrammatic Turkish speakers (Yarbay-Duman, Aygen, Özgirgin, & Bastiaanse, 2007). In particular, producing and comprehending subject and object relatives, where non-finite verbs are used, pose difficulties to Turkish agrammatic speakers (Aydın, 2007;Yarbay-Duman, Aygen, & Bastiaanse, 2008).…”
Section: Agrammatic Aphasia In Turkish Individualssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…It is based on data from many languages (Dutch, English, Turkish, Italian; see, for example, Bastiaanse, Edwards, Maas, & Rispens, 2003;Bastiaanse & Thompson, 2003;Bastiaanse & Van Zonneveld, 2005YarbayDuman, Aygen, Özgirgin, & Bastiaanse, 2007;YarbayDuman, Aygen, & Bastiaanse, 2008;YarbayDuman, Ozgirgin, Altinok, & Bastiaanse, 2011). Contrary to the TDH, it does not assume a representational deficit, but a processing disorder, meaning that the sentence representations are intact, but linguistic operations cannot always be performed correctly.…”
Section: Swahili Syntax and Verb Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This account has been mainly based on verbal production data in Dutch and English (Bastiaanse, Koekkoek, & Van Zonneveld, 2003), by demonstrating that verbs that have to be produced in matrix sentences (e.g., finite sentences in Dutch) are more difficult than verbs in other sentential constructions in which verbs are in their canonical position. This view has been validated in Turkish with object scrambling constructions (Yarbay Duman, Aygen,Özgirgin, & Bastiaanse, 2007) and in Greek with verb and pronouns production (Stavrakaki & Kouvava, 2003). In addition, alternative theories of agrammatic language processing assume that agrammatism results from a general reduction in neurocognitive resources or processing capacities that are required to implement syntactic representations and operations in real time (Carpenter, Miyake, & Just, 1994;Haarman, Just, & Carpenter, 1997;Kolk, 1995;Swinney, Zurif, Prather, & Love, 1996;Zurif, Swinney, Prather, Solomon, & Bushell, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%