Object‐Oriented, Component‐Based, Agent‐Oriented and Service‐Oriented Paradigms in Software Architectures

Amirat, Abdelkrim; Hock-Koon, Anthony; Oussalah, Mourad

doi:10.1002/9781118930960.ch1

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This key role regulates the default communications paradigms, goals, and behaviours of the agent or SO. Additionally, Amirat, Hock-Koon, and Oussalah [44] illustrate that the plans and goals of the SO/agent are represented through templates that reflect their respective functionalities. The other contributions do not refer to pre-established categories or structures.…”

Section: Agent-based Applicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Analysis of Multi Agent Systems Agent Based Programming

Кhusein

2023

JCNS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The effectiveness of agent-based modeling as a simulation modeling methodology has resulted in its application in diverse settings, including the resolution of pragmatic business challenges, in recent times. The domain of symbolic artificial intelligence, which investigates intelligent and self-governing entities, is preoccupied with the mechanisms by which these entities arrive at determinations regarding their conduct in reaction to, or in expectation of, stimuli from the external environment. The scope of the methods employed encompasses a diverse array of techniques, spanning from negotiations to agent simulations, as well as multi-agent argumentation and planning. The present article scrutinizes the utilization of agent-based computing in multi-agent systems and provides an all-encompassing analysis of the relevant literature. This study delves into the examination of both traditional and contemporary agent programming languages, including their respective extensions, comparative analyses, and instances of their application in published literature.

show abstract

Section: Agent-based Applicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Analysis of Multi Agent Systems Agent Based Programming

Кhusein

2023

JCNS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Although SA has been used for decades, professionals still cannot refer to a single SA definition as stakeholders recognize “architecture” based on their interests [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. Therefore, it leads to different purposes for SA, where standards derive between common vocabularies and understanding.…”

Section: Software Architecture Definition Differencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lightweight Software Architecture Evaluation for Industry: A Comprehensive Review

Sahlabadi

Muniyandi

Shukur

et al. 2022

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Processes for evaluating software architecture (SA) help to investigate problems and potential risks in SA. It is derived from many studies that proposed a plethora of systematic SA evaluation methods, while industrial practitioners currently refrain from applying them since they are heavyweight. Nowadays, heterogeneous software architectures are organized based on the new infrastructure. Hardware and associated software allow different systems, such as embedded, sensor-based, modern AI, and cloud-based systems, to cooperate efficiently. It brings more complexities to SA evaluation. Alternatively, lightweight architectural evaluation methods have been proposed to satisfy the practitioner’s concerns, but practitioners still do not adopt these methods. This study employs a systematic literature review with a text analysis of SA’s definitions to propose a comparison framework for SA. It identifies lightweight features and factors to improve the architectural evaluation methods among industrial practitioners. The features are determined based on the practitioner’s concerns by analyzing the architecture’s definitions from stakeholders and reviewing architectural evaluation methods. The lightweight factors are acquired by studying the five most commonly used lightweight methods and the Architecture-based Tradeoff Analysis Method (ATAM), the most well-known heavyweight method. Subsequently, the research addresses these features and factors.

show abstract

“…CBSE and SOSE are two very similar paradigms which are dedicated to construct applications from existing software entities, components or services (Amirat et al, 2014). CBSE is based at the design phase on the notions configuration type and composite component type and on the runtime on their instances configurations and composite components.…”

Section: Heterogeneous Representations: Multi-paradigmsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nowadays, several principles, standards and practices are used for the architectural description of applications using different types of the constituent conceptual bricks. Among the most adopted paradigms dedicated to describe and represent the functional core of applications we find: the approach using services (SOSE) and the approach based-on components (CBSE) (Amirat et al, 2014).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%