Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2012 2012
DOI: 10.5244/c.26.85
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Object Matching Using Boundary Descriptors

Abstract: The problem of object recognition is of immense practical importance and potential, and the last decade has witnessed a number of breakthroughs in the state of the art. Most of the past object recognition work focuses on textured objects and local appearance descriptors extracted around salient points in an image. These methods fail in the matching of smooth, untextured objects for which salient point detection does not produce robust results. The recently proposed bag of boundaries (BoB) method is the first t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The complete process of the proposed descriptor generation is shown in Figure 8. Compared to the descriptor in [39] (named OMBD (Object Matching Using Boundary Descriptors) for short), which is presented for smooth and untextured object matching, our proposed descriptor seems more suitable for remote sensing images with large background variations mainly due to the following aspects.…”
Section: Feature Descriptormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complete process of the proposed descriptor generation is shown in Figure 8. Compared to the descriptor in [39] (named OMBD (Object Matching Using Boundary Descriptors) for short), which is presented for smooth and untextured object matching, our proposed descriptor seems more suitable for remote sensing images with large background variations mainly due to the following aspects.…”
Section: Feature Descriptormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these methods are local feature based, employing local feature descriptors such as SIFT [10] or SURF [11]. The reported performance of these methods has been rather disappointing and a major factor appears to be the loss of spatial, geometric relationship in the aforementioned representations [12,13]. In an effort to overcome this limitation, a number of approaches which divide a coin into segments have been described [14].…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a histogram over a vocabulary of elementary shapes, learnt by clustering local shape descriptors, is used to capture the object's shape. I adopt the standard SIFT descriptor as the basic building block of the texture representation and an analogous descriptor of local shape for the characterization of shape [19]. In both cases descriptors are matched using the Euclidean distance.…”
Section: Object Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%