Object knowledge changes visual appearance: Semantic effects on color afterimages

Abstract

According to predictive coding models of perception, what we see is determined jointly by the current input and the priors established by previous experience, expectations, and other contextual factors. The same input can thus be perceived differently depending on the priors that are brought to bear during viewing. Here, I show that expected (diagnostic) colors are perceived more vividly than arbitrary or unexpected colors, particularly when color input is unreliable. Participants were tested on a version of the 'Spanish Castle Illusion' in which viewing a hue-inverted image renders a subsequently shown achromatic version of the image in vivid color. Adapting to objects with intrinsic colors (e.g., a pumpkin) led to stronger afterimages than adapting to arbitrarily colored objects (e.g., a pumpkin-colored car). Considerably stronger afterimages were also produced by scenes containing intrinsically colored elements (grass, sky) compared to scenes with arbitrarily colored objects (books). The differences between images with diagnostic and arbitrary colors disappeared when the association between the image and color priors was weakened by, e.g., presenting the image upside-down, consistent with the prediction that color appearance is being modulated by color knowledge. Visual inputs that conflict with prior knowledge appear to be phenomenologically discounted, but this discounting is moderated by input certainty, as shown by the final study which uses conventional images rather than afterimages. As input certainty is increased, unexpected colors can become easier to detect than expected ones, a result consistent with predictive-coding models.

Category selectivity for animals and man-made objects: Beyond low- and mid-level visual features

“…Future work should address how the processing of different sources of information, such as different levels of visual and semantic features about animals and man-made objects, may contribute to the differential performance between the categories in visual search. Nonetheless, our work adds to a growing understanding that semantic information may play a role in visual perception (Coren & Enns, 1993;Lupyan, 2015;Lupyan & Ward, 2013).…”

The Psychology of Recent Nature Visits: (How) Are Motives and Attentional Focus Related to Post-Visit Restorative Experiences, Creativity, and Emotional Well-Being?

“…This assumption derives from the so-called New Look of perception, a view that emerged in the 1940's (Erdelyi, 1974;Lindzey, Gilbert, & Fiske, 1998). Although debated, the foundation of the view, stating that perception is dependent on one's internal processes (Erdelyi, 1974), is still prevalent in psychological research (Balcetis & Dunning, 2006;Lupyan, 2015;Voss & Schwieren, 2015). These internal processes include attitudes, values, expectancies, and needs, and they have been argued to bias all human information processing (Erdelyi, 1974).…”

Changing What You See by Changing What You Know: The Role of Attention

“…Indeed, the memory color effects are stronger when a viewer is presented with a more realistic grayscale image (Olkkonen et al, 2008; see also Lupyan, 2015b for an effect of weakening associations by turning the image upside-down on the perceived vividness of color afterimages).…”