2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.braindev.2023.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Object identification in cerebral visual impairment characterized by gaze behavior and image saliency analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…lower associated ROC scores) for the image semantics (GloVe) model compared to controls, given that the image semantics are assumed to be driven by higher-order processing cues. Accordingly, we also expected image salience (GBVS) predictions would be worse, as previous work by our group has demonstrated that individuals with CVI used image salience cues significantly less compared to controls when identifying familiar objects 51 . In this study, we found that controls had higher ROC scores for both the image salience and image semantic predictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…lower associated ROC scores) for the image semantics (GloVe) model compared to controls, given that the image semantics are assumed to be driven by higher-order processing cues. Accordingly, we also expected image salience (GBVS) predictions would be worse, as previous work by our group has demonstrated that individuals with CVI used image salience cues significantly less compared to controls when identifying familiar objects 51 . In this study, we found that controls had higher ROC scores for both the image salience and image semantic predictions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The process included a 7-point calibration task (screen positions: top-left, top-center, top-right, bottom-left, bottom-center, bottom-right, and center-center) followed by a 9-point post calibration verification (i.e., the same 7 calibration points plus center-left and center-right positions). Accuracy criterion was defined by gaze fixation falling within a 2.25 arc degree radius around each of the 9 screen positions and confirmed by visual inspection prior to data collection (testing procedure description taken from previous studies by our group 46 , 47 , 51 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…: impairment in one or multiple visual functions, including visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, color recognition, oculomotor functions (pursuits, saccades), and visual fields; 10 and impairment in higher-order visual perceptual functions such object identification, visuospatial processing, visual attention and visually guided reach). 4,11 Therefore, clinical assessment typically includes examination of ocular function, preferential-looking tests of acuity and contrast sensitivity, and structured history-taking and clinical observation. 12 Additionally, CVI can present varying degrees of deficit across different visual functions, 13 and there are few standardized methods for quantifying these variations in visual functions for this population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%